What's in your PIE? Understanding the contents of personalized information environments with PIEGraph

Author:

Freelon Deen12,Pruden Meredith L.3,Malmer Daniel24,Wu Qunfang5,Xia Yiping6,Johnson Daniel24,Chen Emily2,Crist Andrew2

Affiliation:

1. Annenberg School for Communication University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

2. Center for Information, Technology, and Public Life University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina USA

3. School of Communication and Media Kennesaw State University Kennesaw Georgia USA

4. Hussman School of Journalism and Media University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina USA

5. Inequality in America Initiative Harvard University Cambridge Massachusetts USA

6. Department of Communication & Journalism Texas A&M University College Station Texas USA

Abstract

AbstractSocial media have long been studied from platform‐centric perspectives, which entail sampling messages based on criteria such as keywords and specific accounts. In contrast, user‐centric approaches attempt to reconstruct the personalized information environments users create for themselves. Most user‐centric studies analyze what users have accessed directly through browsers (e.g., through clicks) rather than what they may have seen in their social media feeds. This study introduces a data collection system of our own design called PIEGraph that links survey data with posts collected from participants' personalized X (formerly known as Twitter) timelines. Thus, in contrast with previous research, our data include much more than what users decide to click on. We measure the total amount of data in our participants' respective feeds and conduct descriptive and inferential analyses of three other quantities of interest: political content, ideological skew, and fact quality ratings. Our results are relevant to ongoing debates about digital echo chambers, misinformation, and conspiracy theories; and our general methodological approach could be applied to social media beyond X/Twitter contingent on data availability.

Funder

John S. and James L. Knight Foundation

William and Flora Hewlett Foundation

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Healthier information ecosystems: A definition and agenda;Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology;2024-08-08

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3