Consensus‐based ethical best practices for performing educational point‐of‐care ultrasonography in the emergency department

Author:

Chao Samantha K.1ORCID,Liu Yiju T.23,Kropf Charles W.14ORCID,Huang Robert D.14ORCID,Theyyunni Nik14,Taylor Lindsay A.56,Firn Janice I.78,Kessler Ross9ORCID,Micheller Daniel R.14,Battles Alethia J.10,Rosculet Natalja P.1,Ager Emily E.1ORCID,Valentyne Alyssa A.1,Schellack Christine J.4,Hennessy John P.11,White Cameron11,Tucker Ryan V.12

Affiliation:

1. Department of Emergency Medicine Michigan Medicine Ann Arbor Michigan USA

2. Department of Emergency Medicine Harbor–UCLA Torrance California USA

3. David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA Los Angeles California USA

4. University of Michigan Medical School Ann Arbor Michigan USA

5. Department of Emergency Medicine Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond Virginia USA

6. Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine Richmond Virginia USA

7. Department of Learning Health Sciences University of Michigan Medical School Ann Arbor Michigan USA

8. Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine University of Michigan Medical School Ann Arbor Michigan USA

9. Department of Emergency Medicine University of Washington Seattle Washington USA

10. Michigan Medicine Ann Arbor Michigan USA

11. University of Michigan College of Pharmacy Ann Arbor Michigan USA

12. University of Colorado School of Medicine Aurora Colorado USA

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesThere is no standardized protocol for performing educational point‐of‐care ultrasonography (POCUS) that addresses patient‐centered ethical issues such as obtaining informed consent. This study sought to define principles for ethical application of educational POCUS and develop consensus‐based best practice guidance.MethodsA questionnaire was developed by a trained ethicist after literature review with the help of a medical librarian. A diverse panel including experts in medical education, law, and bioethics; medical trainees; and individuals with no medical background was convened. The panel voted on their level of agreement with ethical principles and degree of appropriateness of behaviors in three rounds of a modified Delphi process. A high level of agreement was defined as 80% or greater consensus.ResultsPanelists voted on 38 total items: 15 related to the patient consent and selection process, eight related to practices while performing educational POCUS, and 15 scenarios involving POCUS application. A high level of agreement was achieved for 13 items related to patient consent and selection, eight items related to performance practices, and 10 scenarios of POCUS application.ConclusionsBased on expert consensus, ethical best practices include obtaining informed consent before performing educational POCUS, allowing patients to decline educational POCUS, informing patients the examination is not intended to be a part of their medical evaluation and is not billed, using appropriate draping techniques, maintaining a professional environment, and disclosing incidental findings in coordination with the primary team caring for the patient. These practices could be implemented at institutions to encourage ethical use of educational POCUS when training physicians, fellows, residents, and medical students.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference24 articles.

1. Ultrasound Guidelines: Emergency Point‐of‐care and Clinical Ultrasound Guidelines in Medicine.American College of Emergency Physicians.2023. Accessed November 1 2023.https://www.acep.org/siteassets/new‐pdfs/policy‐statements/ultrasound‐guidelines‐‐emergency‐point‐of‐care‐and‐clinical‐ultrasound‐guidelines‐in‐medicine.pdf

2. Ultrasonic imaging: safety considerations

3. https://www.acgme.org/globalassets/pfassets/programrequirements/110_emergencymedicine_2023.pdf

4. ACGME Program Requirements for Graduate Medical Education in Family Medicine.Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education.2023. Accessed November 1 2023.https://www.acgme.org/globalassets/pfassets/programrequirements/120_familymedicine_2023.pdf

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3