Differences in emergency medicine resident procedural reporting by race and ethnicity

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThe recruitment, retention, and training of physicians from groups underrepresented in medicine (UiM) is critically important to the practice of emergency medicine (EM). Studies across specialties have demonstrated disparities in operative experiences among UiM resident learners who are UiM; however, there are limited data on procedural disparities in EM.ObjectiveWe sought to quantify the association between racial and ethnic identities that are UiM and the number of procedures reported among EM residents.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective review of procedural differences by UiM status (using self‐identified race and ethnicity) among graduating EM residents at nine training programs over a 10‐year period. Sites were selected to ensure diversity of program length, program type, and geography. Data from residents in combined training programs, those who did not complete their full training at that institution, and those with missing data or electing not to report race/ethnicity were excluded. We calculated median and interquartile ranges for each procedure by UiM status. We conducted multivariable regression analyses accounting for UiM status, gender, and site as well as a sensitivity analysis excluding values >3 standard deviations from the mean for each procedure.ResultsWe collected data from 988 total residents, with 718 (73%) being non‐UiM, 204 (21%) being UiM, 48 (5%) electing not to specific race/ethnicity, and 18 (2%) missing race/ethnicity data. While unadjusted data demonstrated a difference between UiM and non‐UiM resident numbers across several procedures, there were no significant differences in procedures reported after accounting for gender and site in the primary or sensitivity analyses.ConclusionsWe did not identify a statistically significant difference in reported procedures between UiM and non‐UiM residents in EM. Future work should include qualitative investigations of UiM resident experience surrounding procedures as well as mixed‐methods studies to examine how these data interact.