Early CRP kinetics to predict long‐term efficacy of first‐line immune‐checkpoint inhibition combination therapies in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: an updated multicentre real‐world experience applying different CRP kinetics definitions

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesAlthough biomarkers predicting therapy response in first‐line metastatic renal carcinoma (mRCC) therapy remain to be defined, C‐reactive protein (CRP) kinetics have recently been associated with immunotherapy (IO) response. Here, we aimed to assess the predictive and prognostic power of two contemporary CRP kinetics definitions in a large, real‐world first‐line mRCC cohort.MethodsMetastatic renal carcinoma patients treated with IO‐based first‐line therapy within 5 years were retrospectively included in this multicentre study. According to Fukuda et al., patients were defined as ‘CRP flare‐responder’, ‘CRP responder’ and ‘non‐CRP responder’; according to Ishihara et al., patients were defined as ‘normal’, ‘normalised’ and ‘non‐normalised’ based on their early CRP kinetics. Patient and tumor characteristics were compared, and treatment outcome was measured by overall (OS) and progression‐free survival (PFS), including multivariable Cox regression analyses.ResultsOut of 316 mRCC patients, 227 (72%) were assigned to CRP groups according to Fukuda. Both CRP flare‐ (HR [Hazard ratio]: 0.59) and CRP responders (HR: 0.52) had a longer PFS, but not OS, than non‐CRP responders. According to Ishihara, 276 (87%) patients were assigned to the respective groups, and both normal and normalised patients had a significantly longer PFS and OS, compared with non‐normalised group.ConclusionDifferent early CRP kinetics may predict therapy response in first‐line mRCC therapy in a large real‐world cohort. However, further research regarding the optimal timing and frequency of measurement is needed.