Automated Breast Density Assessment in MRI Using Deep Learning and Radiomics: Strategies for Reducing Inter‐Observer Variability

Author:

Jing Xueping12ORCID,Wielema Mirjam3ORCID,Monroy‐Gonzalez Andrea G.3,Stams Thom R.G.3,Mahesh Shekar V.K.3,Oudkerk Matthijs45,Sijens Paul E.3,Dorrius Monique D.3,van Ooijen Peter M.A.12

Affiliation:

1. Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands

2. Machine Learning Lab, Data Science Center in Health (DASH), University Medical Center Groningen University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands

3. Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands

4. Faculty of Medical Sciences University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands

5. Institute of Diagnostic Accuracy Research B.V. Groningen The Netherlands

Abstract

BackgroundAccurate breast density evaluation allows for more precise risk estimation but suffers from high inter‐observer variability.PurposeTo evaluate the feasibility of reducing inter‐observer variability of breast density assessment through artificial intelligence (AI) assisted interpretation.Study TypeRetrospective.PopulationSix hundred and twenty‐one patients without breast prosthesis or reconstructions were randomly divided into training (N = 377), validation (N = 98), and independent test (N = 146) datasets.Field Strength/Sequence1.5 T and 3.0 T; T1‐weighted spectral attenuated inversion recovery.AssessmentFive radiologists independently assessed each scan in the independent test set to establish the inter‐observer variability baseline and to reach a reference standard. Deep learning and three radiomics models were developed for three classification tasks: (i) four Breast Imaging‐Reporting and Data System (BI‐RADS) breast composition categories (A–D), (ii) dense (categories C, D) vs. non‐dense (categories A, B), and (iii) extremely dense (category D) vs. moderately dense (categories A–C). The models were tested against the reference standard on the independent test set. AI‐assisted interpretation was performed by majority voting between the models and each radiologist's assessment.Statistical TestsInter‐observer variability was assessed using linear‐weighted kappa (κ) statistics. Kappa statistics, accuracy, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were used to assess models against reference standard.ResultsIn the independent test set, five readers showed an overall substantial agreement on tasks (i) and (ii), but moderate agreement for task (iii). The best‐performing model showed substantial agreement with reference standard for tasks (i) and (ii), but moderate agreement for task (iii). With the assistance of the AI models, almost perfect inter‐observer variability was obtained for tasks (i) (mean κ = 0.86), (ii) (mean κ = 0.94), and (iii) (mean κ = 0.94).Data ConclusionDeep learning and radiomics models have the potential to help reduce inter‐observer variability of breast density assessment.Level of Evidence3Technical EfficacyStage 1

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Reference35 articles.

1. Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer;Boyd NF;N Engl J Med,2007

2. For the breast cancer surveillance consortium: Population‐attributable risk proportion of clinical risk factors for breast cancer;Engmann NJ;JAMA Oncol,2017

3. Mammographic breast density is associated with the development of contralateral breast cancer;Raghavendra A;Cancer,2017

4. ChenS SpragueBL TiceJA TostesonANA RauscherGH BuistDSM.Cumulative Advanced Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Model Developed in a Screening Mammography Population.2022.

5. Breast density as indicator for the use of mammography or MRI to screen women with familial risk for breast cancer (FaMRIsc): A multicentre randomized controlled trial;Saadatmand S;BMC Cancer,2012

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3