Assessment of Lymphovascular Invasion in Breast Cancer Using a Combined MRI Morphological Features, Radiomics, and Deep Learning Approach Based on Dynamic Contrast‐Enhanced MRI

Author:

Yang Xiuqi1,Fan Xiaohong2,Lin Shanyue3,Zhou Yingjun1,Liu Haibo1,Wang Xuefei4,Zuo Zhichao2,Zeng Ying1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Radiology Xiangtan Central Hospital Xiangtan China

2. The School of Mathematics and Computational Science Xiangtan University Xiangtan China

3. Department of Radiology Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University Guilin China

4. Department of Breast Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing China

Abstract

BackgroundAssessment of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in breast cancer (BC) primarily relies on preoperative needle biopsy. There is an urgent need to develop a non‐invasive assessment method.PurposeTo develop an effective model to assess the LVI status in patients with BC using magnetic resonance imaging morphological features (MRI‐MF), Radiomics, and deep learning (DL) approaches based on dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI (DCE‐MRI).Study TypeCross‐sectional retrospective cohort study.PopulationThe study included 206 BC patients, with 136 in the training set [97 LVI(−) and 39 LVI(+) cases; median age: 51.5 years] and 70 in the test set [52 LVI(−) and 18 LVI(+) cases; median age: 48 years].Field Strength/Sequence1.5 T/T1‐weighted images, fat‐suppressed T2‐weighted images, diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI), and DCE‐MRI.AssessmentThe MRI‐MF model was developed with conventional MR features using logistic analyses. The Radiomic feature extraction process involved collecting data from categorized DCE‐MRI datasets, specifically the first and second post‐contrast images (A1 and A2). Next, a DL model was implemented to determine LVI. Finally, we established a joint diagnosis model by combining the MRI‐MF, Radiomics, and DL approaches.Statistical TestsDiagnostic performance was compared using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, confusion matrix, and decision curve analysis.ResultsRim sign and peritumoral edema features were used to develop the MRI‐MF model, while six Radiomics signature from the A1 and A2 images were used for the Radiomics model. The joint model (MRI‐MF + Radiomics + DL models) achieved the highest accuracy (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.857), being significantly superior to the MRI‐MF (AUC = 0.724), Radiomics (AUC = 0.736), or DL (AUC = 0.740) model. Furthermore, it also outperformed the pairwise combination models: Radiomics + MRI‐MF (AUC = 0.796), DL + MRI‐MF (AUC = 0.796), or DL + Radiomics (AUC = 0.826).Data ConclusionThe joint model incorporating MRI‐MF, Radiomics, and DL approaches can effectively determine the LVI status in patients with BC before surgery.Level of Evidence4Technical EfficacyStage 2

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3