Affiliation:
1. Department of Radiology Xiangtan Central Hospital Xiangtan China
2. The School of Mathematics and Computational Science Xiangtan University Xiangtan China
3. Department of Radiology Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University Guilin China
4. Department of Breast Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing China
Abstract
BackgroundAssessment of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in breast cancer (BC) primarily relies on preoperative needle biopsy. There is an urgent need to develop a non‐invasive assessment method.PurposeTo develop an effective model to assess the LVI status in patients with BC using magnetic resonance imaging morphological features (MRI‐MF), Radiomics, and deep learning (DL) approaches based on dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI (DCE‐MRI).Study TypeCross‐sectional retrospective cohort study.PopulationThe study included 206 BC patients, with 136 in the training set [97 LVI(−) and 39 LVI(+) cases; median age: 51.5 years] and 70 in the test set [52 LVI(−) and 18 LVI(+) cases; median age: 48 years].Field Strength/Sequence1.5 T/T1‐weighted images, fat‐suppressed T2‐weighted images, diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI), and DCE‐MRI.AssessmentThe MRI‐MF model was developed with conventional MR features using logistic analyses. The Radiomic feature extraction process involved collecting data from categorized DCE‐MRI datasets, specifically the first and second post‐contrast images (A1 and A2). Next, a DL model was implemented to determine LVI. Finally, we established a joint diagnosis model by combining the MRI‐MF, Radiomics, and DL approaches.Statistical TestsDiagnostic performance was compared using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, confusion matrix, and decision curve analysis.ResultsRim sign and peritumoral edema features were used to develop the MRI‐MF model, while six Radiomics signature from the A1 and A2 images were used for the Radiomics model. The joint model (MRI‐MF + Radiomics + DL models) achieved the highest accuracy (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.857), being significantly superior to the MRI‐MF (AUC = 0.724), Radiomics (AUC = 0.736), or DL (AUC = 0.740) model. Furthermore, it also outperformed the pairwise combination models: Radiomics + MRI‐MF (AUC = 0.796), DL + MRI‐MF (AUC = 0.796), or DL + Radiomics (AUC = 0.826).Data ConclusionThe joint model incorporating MRI‐MF, Radiomics, and DL approaches can effectively determine the LVI status in patients with BC before surgery.Level of Evidence4Technical EfficacyStage 2
Subject
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献