Affiliation:
1. Neuroscience Research Center Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences University of Milan Milan Italy
2. Neurology Residency Program University of Milan Milan Italy
Abstract
AbstractIntroductionVascular cognitive impairment (VCI) is a common and heterogeneous condition, clinically and pathophysiologically, that still lacks approved treatment.MethodsWe reviewed evidence from randomized and non‐randomized clinical trials in VCI to explore whether any therapeutic option warrants further investigation and to assess possible flaws in previous studies.ResultsWe identified 118 studies after searching PubMed and Embase, including 19,223 participants and 5 different VCI subtypes. We found 63 different types of intervention (51 pharmacologic, 5 employing physical agent application, 7 rehabilitation approaches) compared with either placebo, best medical treatment, or other interventions. Treatment efficacy was assessed through 125 outcome measures (with a clearly pre‐specified primary outcome in 50.8% of studies).DiscussionTherapeutic trials in VCI have been heterogeneous in terms of populations, types of interventions, and outcomes. Overall, a lack of clear pathophysiological rationale for tested interventions seems to emerge, together with the need to homogenize trial study design
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health,Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience,Geriatrics and Gerontology,Neurology (clinical),Developmental Neuroscience,Health Policy,Epidemiology
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献