Understanding communication between patients and healthcare professionals regarding comprehensive biomarker testing in precision oncology: A scoping review

Author:

Pichler Theresia12ORCID,Mumm Friederike12ORCID,Dehar Navdeep3ORCID,Dickman Erin4ORCID,Díez de Los Ríos de la Serna Celia56ORCID,Dinkel Andreas78ORCID,Heinrich Kathrin2ORCID,Hennink Merel9,Parviainen Anndra D.10ORCID,Raske Vincent11,Wicki Nicole11ORCID,Moore Amy C.12

Affiliation:

1. Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital LMU Munich Munich Germany

2. Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich LMU (CCC Munich) Munich Germany

3. Department of Medical Oncology Queen's University Kingston Ontario Canada

4. Oncology Nursing Society Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA

5. European Oncology Nursing Society Brussels Belgium

6. Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Nursing Barcelona University Barcelona Catalonia Spain

7. Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine and Health Technical University of Munich Munich Germany

8. Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich TUM (CCC Munich) Munich Germany

9. Stichting Merels Wereld Groningen The Netherlands

10. Department of Nursing Science, Faculty of Health Sciences University of Eastern Finland Kuopio Finland

11. The Synergist Brussels Belgium

12. LUNGevity Foundation Chicago Illinois USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundPrecision oncology, using comprehensive biomarker testing (cBT) to inform individual cancer diagnosis, prognosis and treatment, includes increasingly complex technology and clinical data sets. People impacted by cancer (patients and caregivers) and healthcare professionals (HCPs) face distinct challenges in navigating the cBT and personalized treatment landscape. This review summarizes evidence regarding cBT‐related communication between people impacted by cancer and HCPs and identifies important avenues for future research in precision oncology.MethodsA scoping review was conducted using records published in PubMed during January 2017–August 2022, focusing on the breadth of topics on patient‐HCP communication and knowledge resources used by HCPs as guidance in cBT‐related communication. Data were extracted from records meeting inclusion criteria, and findings were summarized according to main topics.ResultsThe search identified 287 unique records and data were extracted from 42 records, including nine from expert input. Most records originated from the United States included patients with different types of cancer, and oncologists were the main HCPs. Patients' motivation for undergoing cBT and receiving results was generally high in different settings. However, patients' understanding of cBT‐related concepts was limited, and their knowledge and information preferences changed based on cBT implications and significance to family members. HCPs were valued by patients as a trusted source of information. Limited evidence was available on HCPs' information‐seeking behavior and factors influencing cBT‐related knowledge and confidence, often self‐reported as insufficient.ConclusionsPatient education by knowledgeable and confident HCPs, information management and a caring patient‐HCP relationship communicating continuity of care regardless of cBT results are crucial to empower patients and shared decision‐making in precision oncology. More data on the process and structure of cBT‐related communication, distinction between and characterization of different timepoints of patient‐HCP interactions are needed.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Cancer Research,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Oncology

Reference80 articles.

1. Association of Community Cancer Centers.Lexicon.2022. Accessed January 18 2023.https://www.accc‐cancer.org/home/learn/precision‐medicine/cancer‐diagnostics/biomarkers/biomarkerlive/lexicon

2. Adopting Consensus Terms for Testing in Precision Medicine

3. National Cancer Institute.Precision medicine definition.2022. Accessed January 18 2023.https://www.cancer.gov/publications/dictionaries/cancer‐terms/def/precision‐medicine

4. The current state of molecular testing in the treatment of patients with solid tumors, 2019

5. Genetic Testing and Results in a Population-Based Cohort of Breast Cancer Patients and Ovarian Cancer Patients

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3