Meta-analysis of radical resection rates and margin assessment in pancreatic cancer

Author:

Chandrasegaram M D123,Goldstein D4,Simes J1,Gebski V1,Kench J G56,Gill A J7,Samra J S86,Merrett N D93,Richardson A J106,Barbour A P11

Affiliation:

1. National Health and Medical Research Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Westmead, Australia

2. Discipline of Surgery, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

3. Department of Surgery, Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

4. Department of Medical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Prince of Wales Clinical School University of New South Wales, Westmead, Australia

5. Department of Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Westmead, Australia

6. Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

7. Cancer Diagnosis and Pathology Research Group, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Westmead, Australia

8. Department of Surgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, Westmead, Australia

9. Discipline of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Western Sydney, Westmead, Australia

10. Department of Surgery, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Australia

11. University of Queensland, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Abstract

Abstract Background R0 resection rates (complete tumour removal with negative resection margins) in pancreatic cancer are 70–80 per cent when a 0-mm margin is used, declining to 15–24 per cent with a 1-mm margin. This review evaluated the R0 resection rates according to different margin definitions and techniques. Methods Three databases (MEDLINE from 1946, PubMed from 1946 and Embase from 1949) were searched to mid-October 2014. The search terms included ‘pancreatectomy OR pancreaticoduodenectomy’ and ‘margin’. A meta-analysis was performed with studies in three groups: group 1, axial slicing technique (minimum 1-mm margin); group 2, other slicing techniques (minimum 1-mm margin); and group 3, studies with minimum 0-mm margin. Results The R0 rates were 29 (95 per cent c.i. 26 to 32) per cent in group 1 (8 studies; 882 patients) and 49 (47 to 52) per cent in group 2 (6 studies; 1568 patients). The combined R0 rate (groups 1 and 2) was 41 (40 to 43) per cent. The R0 rate in group 3 (7 studies; 1926 patients) with a 0-mm margin was 72 (70 to 74) per cent The survival hazard ratios (R1 resection/R0 resection) revealed a reduction in the risk of death of at least 22 per cent in group 1, 12 per cent in group 2 and 23 per cent in group 3 with an R0 compared with an R1 resection. Local recurrence occurred more frequently with an R1 resection in most studies. Conclusion Margin clearance definitions affect R0 resection rates in pancreatic cancer surgery. This review collates individual studies providing an estimate of achievable R0 rates, creating a benchmark for future trials.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3