The use of a mobile obstetric emergency system to improve obstetric referrals in Bong County, Liberia: A pre‐post study

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveLiberia experiences an unmet need for cesarean section with about 5% population coverage, lower than 9%–19% coverage associated with improved maternal and newborn outcomes. Delays in the referral process for comprehensive emergency obstetric and newborn care (CEmONC) services due to ineffective communication between a rural health facility (RHF) and a district hospital contribute to the low CS rate. This study examined the association between mobile obstetric emergency system (MORES) implementation and referral time for obstetric emergencies as well as maternal/newborn outcomes.MethodsA pre‐post descriptive analysis was conducted on data collected from 20 rural health facilities (RHFs) and two hospitals in Bong County. Women with referral data from both RHFs and hospitals were matched and information including transfer time, reasons for referral, and maternal and newborn outcomes were extracted. Descriptive analysis and logistic regression models examined the relationship between the intervention's implementation and mode of delivery, maternal outcome, newborn outcome, and transfer time from RHF to district hospital. Ethics approval was obtained from two study centers.ResultsWomen had higher odds of undergoing a CS at endline (OR: 1.86 95% CI: 0.99–3.46) compared to baseline. Additionally, newborns had lower odds of showing non‐vigorous symptoms (OR: 0.31; 95% CI: 0.14–0.68), defined as a newborn with poor respiratory effort, muscle tone, or heart rate. There was no significant association between the intervention's implementation and transfer time.ConclusionThe MORES intervention is a promising means to increase timely care seeking along the referral pathway which may enhance access to cesarean section as well as improved newborn outcome in low‐ and middle‐income countries.