A user independent denoising method for x‐nuclei MRI and MRS

Author:

Christensen Nichlas Vous1ORCID,Vaeggemose Michael12ORCID,Bøgh Nikolaj13ORCID,Hansen Esben S. S.1ORCID,Olesen Jonas L.4ORCID,Kim Yaewon5ORCID,Vigneron Daniel B.5ORCID,Gordon Jeremy W.5ORCID,Jespersen Sune N.4ORCID,Laustsen Christoffer1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. The MR Research Centre, Department of Clinical Medicine Aarhus University Aarhus Denmark

2. GE Healthcare Brøndby Denmark

3. A&E, Gødstrup Hospital Herning Denmark

4. Center of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience (CFIN) and MINDLab, Department of Clinical Medicine Aarhus University Aarhus Denmark

5. Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging University of California San Francisco (UCSF) San Francisco California USA

Abstract

AbstractPurposeX‐nuclei (also called non‐proton MRI) MRI and spectroscopy are limited by the intrinsic low SNR as compared to conventional proton imaging. Clinical translation of x‐nuclei examination warrants the need of a robust and versatile tool improving image quality for diagnostic use. In this work, we compare a novel denoising method with fewer inputs to the current state‐of‐the‐art denoising method.MethodsDenoising approaches were compared on human acquisitions of sodium (23Na) brain, deuterium (2H) brain, carbon (13C) heart and brain, and simulated dynamic hyperpolarized 13C brain scans, with and without additional noise. The current state‐of‐the‐art denoising method Global‐local higher order singular value decomposition (GL‐HOSVD) was compared to the few‐input method tensor Marchenko‐Pastur principal component analysis (tMPPCA). Noise‐removal was quantified by residual distributions, and statistical analyses evaluated the differences in mean‐square‐error and Bland–Altman analysis to quantify agreement between original and denoised results of noise‐added data.ResultsGL‐HOSVD and tMPPCA showed similar performance for the variety of x‐nuclei data analyzed in this work, with tMPPCA removing ˜5% more noise on average over GL‐HOSVD. The mean ratio between noise‐added and denoising reproducibility coefficients of the Bland–Altman analysis when compared to the original are also similar for the two methods with 3.09 ± 1.03 and 2.83 ± 0.79 for GL‐HOSVD and tMPPCA, respectively.ConclusionThe strength of tMPPCA lies in the few‐input approach, which generalizes well to different data sources. This makes the use of tMPPCA denoising a robust and versatile tool in x‐nuclei imaging improvements and the preferred denoising method.

Funder

Lundbeck Foundation

National Institutes of Health

Innovationsfonden

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3