Affiliation:
1. OCAD University Toronto Canada
2. York University Toronto Canada
Abstract
AbstractIn this article, we investigate the critical intersections of AI, academic integrity, and disability in the context of a large undergraduate course. Our aim was to adapt the course to respond to generative AI (GenAI) to avoid entrenching barriers for students, and instead teach them how to use GenAI tools in ways that deepen their learning and uphold academic honesty. Grounded in disability justice and access pedagogies, we outline five design goals centered on guidelines for AI usage, education on responsible AI use, revised assessments, support for teaching assistants (TAs), and accessible materials. These activities are detailed in our methodology. In our findings, we provide a critical reflection of the course adaptation, taking up issues such as varying levels of familiarity with GenAI, students’ capacity to engage with course changes, resistance to GenAI, instructors’ relational shifts to AI, and feelings of demoralization among the teaching team. We conclude by offering practical recommendations for educators, calling for learning communities to view this disruption as an invitation to listen to disabled students.
Reference39 articles.
1. Barry C.(2023 May 18).AI is strengthening the future of accessibility.Microsoft News Center Canada.https://news.microsoft.com/en‐ca/2023/05/18/ai‐is‐strengthening‐the‐future‐of‐accessibility/
2. Brown L. X. Z.(2020 November 16).How automated test proctoring software discriminates against disabled students.Centre for Democracy & Technology.https://cdt.org/insights/how‐automated‐test‐proctoring‐software‐discriminates‐against‐disabled‐students/
3. Cambridge D. &Suter V.(2005).Community of practice design guide: A step‐by‐step guide for designing & cultivating communities of practice in higher education.Educause.https://library.educause.edu/resources/2005/1/community‐of‐practice‐design‐guide‐a‐stepbystep‐guide‐for‐designing‐cultivating‐communities‐of‐practice‐in‐higher‐education