Venous thromboembolism risk in cancer patients receiving first‐line immune checkpoint inhibitor versus chemotherapy

Author:

Li Ang1ORCID,May Sarah B.2,La Jennifer34,Martens Kylee L.5,Amos Christopher I.26,Flowers Christopher R.7,Do Nhan V.38,Brophy Mary T.38,Chitalia Vipul38,Ravid Katya8,Gaziano John Michael34,Fillmore Nathanael R.34

Affiliation:

1. Section of Hematology‐Oncology Baylor College of Medicine Houston Texas USA

2. Institute for Clinical & Translational Research Baylor College of Medicine Houston Texas USA

3. Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center VA Boston Healthcare System Boston Massachusetts USA

4. Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA

5. Division of Hematology‐Oncology, Knight Cancer Institute Oregon Health & Science University Portland Oregon USA

6. Section of Epidemiology and Population Science Baylor College of Medicine Houston Texas USA

7. Department of Lymphoma‐Myeloma, Division of Cancer Medicine The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA

8. Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine Boston Massachusetts USA

Abstract

AbstractIt remains unclear if immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy is associated with higher rate of venous thromboembolism (VTE) compared with cytotoxic chemotherapy (chemo) in patients with comparable cancer type, staging, and comorbidities. Using the national Veterans Affairs healthcare system database from 2016 to 2021, we performed a propensity score (PS)‐weighted retrospective cohort study to compare the incidence of VTE in patients with selected stage III/IV cancer receiving first‐line ICI versus chemo. The PS model utilized overlap weights to balance age, sex, race, treatment year, VTE history, paralysis/immobilization, prolonged hospitalization, cancer type, staging, time between diagnosis and treatment, and National Cancer Institute comorbidity index. Weighted Cox regressions with robust standard error were used to assess the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). We found that among comparable advanced cancers, first‐line ICI (n = 1823) and first‐line chemo (n = 6345) had similar rates of VTE (8.49% for ICI and 8.36% for chemo at 6 months). The weighted HR was 1.06 (95% CI 0.88–1.26) for ICI versus chemo. In a subgroup analysis restricted to lung cancers, first‐line ICI/chemo (n = 828), ICI monotherapy (n = 428), and chemo monotherapy (n = 4371) had similar rates of VTE (9.60% for ICI/chemo, 10.04% for ICI, and 8.91% for chemo at 6 months). The weighted HR was 1.05 (95% CI 0.77–1.42) for ICI versus chemo, and 1.08 (95% CI 0.83–1.42) for ICI/chemo versus chemo. In conclusion, ICI as a systemic therapy has a similarly elevated risk as cytotoxic chemo for VTE occurrence in cancer patients. This finding can inform future prospective studies exploring thromboprophylaxis strategies.

Funder

American Heart Association

Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Hematology

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3