Comps: Content analysis of doctoral comprehensive exam policies and procedures-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Comps: Content analysis of doctoral comprehensive exam policies and procedures

Published:2024-05-23 Issue: Volume: Page:
ISSN:0011-0035
Container-title:Counselor Education and Supervision
language:en
Short-container-title:Couns Edu & Supervision

Author:

Arnold Amanda C.¹^ORCID,DeDiego Amanda C.²^ORCID,Li Minyi³^ORCID,Keys Ashton⁴^ORCID,Pipp Anastasia⁵^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Professional Counseling Mount Mary University Milwaukee Wisconsin USA

2. School of Counseling, Leadership, Advocacy, and Design University of Wyoming Casper Wyoming USA

3. Warner School of Education and Human Development University of Rochester Rochester New York USA

4. Counseling and Therapy Capella University Minneapolis Minnesota USA

5. School of Counseling, Leadership, Advocacy, and Design University of Wyoming Laramie Wyoming USA

Abstract

AbstractThe doctoral comprehensive exam is a common benchmark in counselor education doctoral programs. The current study examined policies and procedures for comprehensive exams in CACREP‐accredited counselor education doctoral programs. Using conventional qualitative content analysis, researchers analyzed CACREP‐accredited doctoral program student handbooks to determine common practices for conducting comprehensive exams.

Publisher

Wiley

Link

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ceas.12306

Reference22 articles.

1. American Counseling Association. (2014).2014 ACA code of ethics.

2. Council for Accreditation of Counseling and Related Educational Programs. (2016).2016 CACREP standards.

3. Council for Accreditation of Counseling and Related Educational Programs. (2024).2024 CACREP standards.