Evolution and variation in amide aminoacyl‐tRNA synthesis

Abstract

AbstractThe amide proteogenic amino acids, asparagine and glutamine, are two of the twenty amino acids used in translation by all known life. The aminoacyl‐tRNA synthetases for asparagine and glutamine, asparaginyl‐tRNA synthetase and glutaminyl tRNA synthetase, evolved after the split in the last universal common ancestor of modern organisms. Before that split, life used two‐step indirect pathways to synthesize asparagine and glutamine on their cognate tRNAs to form the aminoacyl‐tRNA used in translation. These two‐step pathways were retained throughout much of the bacterial and archaeal domains of life and eukaryotic organelles. The indirect routes use non‐discriminating aminoacyl‐tRNA synthetases (non‐discriminating aspartyl‐tRNA synthetase and non‐discriminating glutamyl‐tRNA synthetase) to misaminoacylate the tRNA. The misaminoacylated tRNA formed is then transamidated into the amide aminoacyl‐tRNA used in protein synthesis by tRNA‐dependent amidotransferases (GatCAB and GatDE). The enzymes and tRNAs involved assemble into complexes known as transamidosomes to help maintain translational fidelity. These pathways have evolved to meet the varied cellular needs across a diverse set of organisms, leading to significant variation. In certain bacteria, the indirect pathways may provide a means to adapt to cellular stress by reducing the fidelity of protein synthesis. The retention of these indirect pathways versus acquisition of asparaginyl‐tRNA synthetase and glutaminyl tRNA synthetase in lineages likely involves a complex interplay of the competing uses of glutamine and asparagine beyond translation, energetic costs, co‐evolution between enzymes and tRNA, and involvement in stress response that await further investigation.