Group schema therapy for cluster‐C personality disorders: A multicentre open pilot study

Author:

Wibbelink Carlijn J. M.1ORCID,Venhuizen Anne‐Sophie S. M.1,Grasman Raoul P. P. P.2,Bachrach Nathan34ORCID,van den Hengel Charlotte1,Hudepohl Sandy5,Kunst Liselotte67,de Lange Hinde8,Louter Mark A.9,Matthijssen Suzy J. M. A.10,Schaling Arita11,Walhout Simone12,Wichers Karen (Renske)13,Arntz Arnoud1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Clinical Psychology University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands

2. Department of Psychological Methods University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands

3. Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology Tilburg University Tilburg The Netherlands

4. GGZ Oost Brabant Helmond Helmond Netherlands

5. PsyQ Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands

6. PsyQ Haarlem Haarlem The Netherlands

7. NPI Amsterdam The Netherlands

8. Emergis Kloetinge The Netherlands

9. Viersprong Institute for Studies on Personality Disorders Rotterdam The Netherlands

10. Altrecht Academic Anxiety Centre, Altrecht GGz Utrecht The Netherlands

11. Pro Persona Ede The Netherlands

12. GGZ Oost Brabant Oss Oss The Netherlands

13. IPGGZ Veendam The Netherlands

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundGroup schema therapy (GST) is increasingly popular as a treatment for personality disorders (PDs), including Cluster‐C PDs. Individual ST has proven to be effective for Cluster‐C PD patients, while the evidence for GST is limited. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of GST for Cluster‐C PD. Moreover, differences between the specific Cluster‐C PDs (avoidant PD, dependent PD and obsessive‐compulsive PD) were explored.MethodsA multicentre open trial was conducted, including 137 patients with a Cluster‐C PD (avoidant PD: n = 107, dependent PD: n = 11 and obsessive‐compulsive PD: n = 19). Patients received 30 weekly GST sessions with a maximum of 180 min of individual ST and five optional monthly booster sessions. Outcome measures including Cluster‐C PD severity, general psychopathological symptoms, quality of life, functional impairment, happiness, PD‐related beliefs, self‐esteem, self‐ideal discrepancy, schemas and schema modes were assessed at baseline until 2‐year follow‐up with semi‐structured interviews and self‐report measures. Change over time and differences between the specific Cluster‐C PDs were analysed with mixed regression analyses.ResultsThe outcome measures showed significant improvements for all Cluster‐C PDs, with medium to large effect sizes after 2 years. A treatment dropout rate of 11.7% was found. There were some indications for differences between the Cluster‐C PDs in severity at baseline, change trajectories and effectiveness of GST.ConclusionsThis study demonstrated that GST is a promising treatment for Cluster‐C PDs. The following step is a randomized controlled trial to further document the (cost‐)effectiveness of GST.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Clinical Psychology

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3