Predictive factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury in primiparous women: systematic review and meta‐analysis

Author:

Packet B.1ORCID,Page A.‐S.2,Cattani L.2,Bosteels J.23,Deprest J.24ORCID,Richter J.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Development and Regeneration, Unit of Woman and Child Catholic University of Leuven (KU Leuven) Leuven Belgium

2. Department of Development and Regeneration, Unit of Urogenital, Abdominal and Plastic Surgery Catholic University of Leuven (KU Leuven) Leuven Belgium

3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Imelda Hospital Bonheiden Belgium

4. Research Department of Maternal–Fetal Medicine, Institute for Women's Health University College London London UK

Abstract

ABSTRACTObjectivesThe primary objective was to perform a systematic review of predictive factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) occurrence at first vaginal delivery, with the diagnosis made by ultrasound (US‐OASI). The secondary objective was to report on incidence rates of sonographic anal sphincter (AS) trauma, including trauma that was not clinically reported at childbirth, among the studies providing data for our primary objective.MethodsWe conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, CINAHL, The Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. Both observational cohort studies and interventional trials were eligible for inclusion. Study eligibility was assessed independently by two authors. Random‐effects meta‐analyses were performed to pool effect estimates from studies reporting on similar predictive factors. Summary odds ratio (OR) or mean difference (MD) is reported with 95% CI. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. Methodological quality was assessed using the Quality in Prognosis Studies tool.ResultsA total of 2805 records were screened and 21 met the inclusion criteria (16 prospective cohort studies, three retrospective cohort studies and two interventional non‐randomized trials). Increasing gestational age at delivery (MD, 0.34 (95% CI, 0.04–0.64) weeks), shorter antepartum perineal body length (MD, −0.60 (95% CI, −1.09 to −0.11) cm), labor augmentation (OR, 1.81 (95% CI, 1.21–2.71)), instrumental delivery (OR, 2.13 (95% CI, 1.13–4.01)), in particular forceps extraction (OR, 3.56 (95% CI, 1.31–9.67)), shoulder dystocia (OR, 12.07 (95% CI, 1.06–137.60)), episiotomy use (OR, 1.85 (95% CI, 1.11–3.06)) and shorter episiotomy length (MD, −0.40 (95% CI, −0.75 to −0.05) cm) were associated with US‐OASI. When pooling incidence rates, 26% (95% CI, 20–32%) of women who had a first vaginal delivery had US‐OASI (20 studies; I2 = 88%). In studies reporting on both clinical and US‐OASI rates, 20% (95% CI, 14–28%) of women had AS trauma on ultrasound that was not reported clinically at childbirth (16 studies; I2 = 90%). No differences were found in maternal age, body mass index, weight, subpubic arch angle, induction of labor, epidural analgesia, episiotomy angle, duration of first/second/active‐second stages of labor, vacuum extraction, neonatal birth weight or head circumference between cases with and those without US‐OASI. Antenatal perineal massage and use of an intrapartum pelvic floor muscle dilator did not affect the odds of US‐OASI. Most (81%) studies were judged to be at high risk of bias in at least one domain and only four (19%) studies had an overall low risk of bias.ConclusionGiven the ultrasound evidence of structural damage to the AS in 26% of women following a first vaginal delivery, clinicians should have a low threshold of suspicion for the condition. This systematic review identified several predictive factors for this. © 2023 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Funder

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Reproductive Medicine,General Medicine,Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Reference61 articles.

1. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 198: Prevention and Management of Obstetric Lacerations at Vaginal Delivery

2. An International Continence Society (ICS)/ International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) joint report on the terminology for the assessment and management of obstetric pelvic floor disorders

3. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.The management of third‐ and fourth‐degree perineal tears. (Green‐top Guideline No. 29) 2015.https://www.rcog.org.uk/guidance/browse‐all‐guidance/green‐top‐guidelines/third‐and‐fourth‐degree‐perineal‐tears‐management‐green‐top‐guideline‐no‐29

4. Postpartum ultrasound for the diagnosis of obstetrical anal sphincter injury;Bellussi F;Am J Obstet Gynecol,2021

5. Can transperineal ultrasound improve the diagnosis of obstetric anal sphincter injuries?

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3