Australian adults’ attitudes towards government actions to protect children from digital marketing of unhealthy food and drink products

Abstract

AbstractIssue AddressedThis study assessed Australian adults' attitudes towards government actions to protect children from digital marketing of unhealthy food and drink products.MethodsAn online survey was undertaken by Australian adults aged 18–64 recruited via two national panels in December 2019 (N = 2044).ResultsMost respondents (69%) agreed the Government should protect children from unhealthy food and drink marketing and advertising broadly. Those who agreed most commonly indicated children should be protected up to age 16 (34%) or 18 (24%). There was widespread support for government actions to stop unhealthy food and drink marketing on digital platforms (e.g., internet sites) (68%–69%) and various digital marketing techniques (e.g., advertising by brands on social media) (56%–71%). A total ban on targeting unhealthy food and drink marketing to children online received the highest level of support (76%). Most respondents (81%) disagreed unhealthy food and drink companies should be able to collect children's personal information for marketing purposes. Support for examined actions was generally higher among older adults, more educated adults and more frequent internet users, lower among males, and similar between parents and non‐parents.ConclusionsThere is public perception that the government is responsible for protecting children, well into adolescence, from unhealthy food and drink marketing broadly. Widespread public support extends to specific actions to reduce children's exposure to digital marketing of unhealthy food and drink products.So What?Implementation of policies to protect children from digital marketing of unhealthy food and drink products would be well received by the Australian public.