Assessing Patient Values and Preferences to Inform the 2023 American College of Rheumatology/American College of Chest Physicians Interstitial Lung Disease Guidelines

Author:

Mirza Reza D.1ORCID,Bolster Marcy B.2ORCID,Johnson Sindhu R.3ORCID,Allen Aberdeen4,Bernstein Elana J.5,Chung Jonathan H.6,Danoff Sonye K.7,Falardeau Catherine4,Guyatt Gordon1,Ivlev Ilya8ORCID,Khanna Dinesh9ORCID,Nesbitt Kiana T.4,Turner Amy10ORCID,Uhl Stacey11,George Michael D.12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada

2. Massachusetts General Hospital Boston

3. Toronto Western Hospital Toronto Ontario Canada

4. American College of Rheumatology SARD‐ILD Patient Panel

5. Columbia University New York City

6. The University of Chicago Chicago Illinois

7. Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore Maryland

8. Oregon Health & Science University Portland

9. University of Michigan Ann Arbor

10. American College of Rheumatology Atlanta Georgia

11. ERCI Institute, Plymouth Meeting Pennsylvania

12. Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia

Abstract

ObjectivePatient engagement is critical to clinical practice guideline (CPG) development. This work presents our approach to ascertaining patients’ values and preferences to inform the American College of Rheumatology guidelines for screening, monitoring, and treatment of interstitial lung disease (ILD) in people with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs).MethodsWe conducted a cross‐sectional qualitative study of a purposefully sampled Patient Panel using a modified content analytic approach. The study team reviewed text transcripts from the Patient Panel discussion to identify themes and develop a clustered thematic schema.ResultsTwenty‐one patients (75% women) participated, with a mean age of 53 years (range 33–73). Patients had one or more SARDs: systemic sclerosis (38%), Sjögren disease (38%), idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (33%), rheumatoid arthritis (24%), and mixed connective tissue disease (10%). We identified 10 themes in 4 thematic clusters: communication, screening and monitoring, treatment goals, and treatment adverse effects. Patients prioritized recognizing ILD symptoms, importance of ILD screening and close monitoring, goals of survival and improving quality of life, and willingness to accept treatment risks provided that there is close communication with providers. Patient representatives shared patients’ priorities and insight at the Voting Panel meeting, influencing multiple guideline recommendations.ConclusionPatient engagement fosters a holistic approach to CPG development, leading to recommendations aiming for the best clinical outcomes while prioritizing outcomes important for patients. The patient‐identified themes played a critical role in ILD guideline development and provide core elements for shared decision‐making as clinicians make management and therapeutic decisions with patients with SARD‐associated ILD.image

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3