Weathering the storm when the end of the road is near: A qualitative analysis of supportive care needs during CAR T‐cell therapy in pediatrics

Author:

Steineck Angela1ORCID,Silbert Sara K.2,Palm Kallie1,Nepper Jordyn3,Vaughn Dagny4,Shipman Kelly5,Shalabi Haneen2,Wiener Lori2ORCID,Comiskey Liam6,Knight Jennifer M.7,Levine Deena8

Affiliation:

1. MACC Fund Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders Department of Pediatrics Medical College of Wisconsin Milwaukee Wisconsin USA

2. Pediatric Oncology Branch National Cancer Institute Bethesda Maryland USA

3. Medical School Medical College of Wisconsin Milwaukee Wisconsin USA

4. College of Medicine Health Sciences Center University of Tennessee Memphis Tennessee USA

5. Center for Cellular Immunotherapies Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

6. Department of Psychosocial Oncology & Palliative Care Dana‐Farber Cancer Institute Boston Massachusetts USA

7. Departments of Psychiatry, Medicine, and Microbiology & Immunology Medical College of Wisconsin Milwaukee Wisconsin USA

8. Division of Palliative Care, Department of Oncology St. Jude Children's Research Hospital Memphis Tennessee USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundChimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T‐cell therapy provides promising outcomes in relapsed/refractory B acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), yet still carries high toxicity rates and relatively poor long‐term survival. Efficacy has yet to be demonstrated in other diagnoses while toxicity and risk profiles remain formidable. To date, treatment‐related symptom burden is gleaned from clinical trial toxicity reports; the patient perspective remains understudied.MethodsEnglish‐ or Spanish‐speaking patients (ages 8–25 years) undergoing CAR T‐cell therapy for any malignancy and their primary caregivers were recruited from Seattle Children's Hospital (SCH), St. Jude Children's Research Hospital (SJCRH), and the Pediatric Oncology Branch of the National Cancer Institute (NCI). Both patient and caregiver completed semi‐structured dyadic interviews 3 months post treatment. We used directed content analysis for codebook development and thematic network analysis for inductive qualitative analysis.ResultsTwenty families completed interviews (13 patients, 15 parents). Patients were a median age 16.5 years, predominantly female (65%), White (75%), and diagnosed with ALL (75%). Global themes included “A clear decision,” “Coping with symptoms,” and “Unforeseen psychosocial challenges.” When families were asked to describe the “most challenging part of treatment,” most described “the unknown.” Most reported “the symptoms really weren't that bad,” even among patients hospitalized for severe toxicity events. Fatigue, pain, and nausea were the most prevalent symptoms. Importantly, only one family would have chosen a different therapy, if given another opportunity.ConclusionsAlthough physical symptoms were largely tolerable, recognizing supportive care opportunities remains imperative, particularly psychosocial concerns.

Funder

National Institutes of Health

American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute

Conquer Cancer Foundation

St. Baldrick's Foundation

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3