Investigation of the abortion‐related experience of the providers, women, and advocators in South Korea: The neglected essential healthcare service

Author:

Moon Juhyeon1ORCID,Oh Rora1ORCID,Chang Eun Jee1ORCID,Park Jiwon2ORCID,Choe Seung‐Ah3ORCID,Kim Saerom14ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Public Health, Graduate School of Public Health Seoul National University Seoul Republic of Korea

2. UNICEF Bangladesh Dhaka Bangladesh

3. Department of Preventive Medicine College of Medicine, Korea University Seoul Republic of Korea

4. Gender and Health Research Center People’s Health Institute Korea

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveThe decriminalization of abortions in South Korea in 2019 has not been followed by the establishment of policies ensuring access to abortion services. This study aimed to explore the current challenges and barriers for quality abortion services in the Korean healthcare system.MethodsEleven women, six healthcare providers, and 11 advocates participated in in‐depth interviews in 2020. Experiences of abortion were analyzed using the modified Availability, Accessibility, Acceptability, and Quality (AAAQ) framework.ResultsWhile informal, access to surgical abortion services was possible in general. However, accessibility to services and information varied according to women's age, marital status, and physical condition. Considering that the Korean government has been reluctant to adopt proactive measures to ensure access to abortion services, the quality of abortion care in Korea remains questionable, with the mandate of male consent for abortion prevailing. The women interviewed in this study expressed dissatisfaction with their current access to and the quality of abortion services.ConclusionAbortion is an essential service that ensures the sexual and reproductive health and rights of women. Although abortion was decriminalized in Korea in 2019, it remains an informal and stigmatized service. Further research and policy efforts are required to ensure access to abortion in Korea.

Funder

National Research Foundation of Korea

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,General Medicine

Reference20 articles.

1. The role of reproductive justice movements in challenging South Korea's abortion ban;Kim SH;Health Hum Rights,2019

2. HIRA bigdata open portal [website]. Medical statistics by disease/procedure disease subcategory statistics.2023. Wonju (KR): Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service. Accessed July 18 2023.https://opendata.hira.or.kr/home.do

3. Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs.Artificial abortion survey.2021. Sejong (KR): Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs. Accessed July 18 2023.https://www.kihasa.re.kr/news/press/view?seq=47320

4. KimHJ AnnHS KimSD et al.Survey on artificial abortion and establishment of comprehensive strategy (2005). R0408081. Seoul (KR): Korean University & Korean Government Ministry of Health and Welfare2005.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Abortion Anarchy? The Case for Abortion Decriminalization;Social & Legal Studies;2024-06-05

2. Editorial: Women facing crises;International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics;2023-10-20

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3