Affiliation:
1. Department of Periodontology Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences Tokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU) Tokyo Japan
2. Department of Lifetime Oral Health Care Science Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences Tokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU) Tokyo Japan
3. Taniguchi Dental Clinic Sapporo Japan
4. Department of Maxillofacial Surgery Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences Tokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU) Tokyo Japan
5. Department of Periodontology Kanagawa Dental University (KDU) Yokosuka Japan
6. Oral Care Periodontics Center Southern TOHOKU Research Institute for Neuroscience Southern TOHOKU General Hospital Koriyama Japan
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundThis study evaluated the effectiveness of a novel pocket therapy (Er:YAG laser‐assisted comprehensive periodontal pocket therapy [Er‐LCPT]) for residual pocket treatment, compared with conventional mechanical treatment alone, in a randomized controlled clinical trial.MethodsTwo sites in 18 patients having residual periodontal pockets of ≥5 mm depth, extant following initial active therapy, or during supportive therapy, were randomized into two groups in a split mouth design: the control group received scaling and root planing (SRP) by curette, and the test group received Er‐LCPT using curette and laser. With Er‐LCPT, after root debridement, inflamed connective tissue on the inner gingival surface and on the bone surface/within extant bone defects was thoroughly debrided. Furthermore, removal of proximate oral epithelium and coagulation of the blood clot in the pocket entrance were performed with laser. Clinical parameters were evaluated, before and after treatment, through 12 months.ResultsBoth groups showed significant improvements in clinical parameters. With Er‐LCPT, pocket debridement was thoroughly and safely performed, without any adverse side effects and complications, and favorable healing was observed in most of the cases. At 12 months, Er‐LCPT demonstrated significantly higher probing pocket depth reduction (2.78 mm vs. 1.89 mm on average; p = 0.012, Wilcoxon signed‐rank test), clinical attachment gain (1.67 mm vs. 1.06 mm; p = 0.004) as primary outcomes, and reduced BOP value (0.89 vs. 0.56; p = 0.031), compared with SRP alone.ConclusionThe results of this study indicate that Er‐LCPT is more effective for residual pocket treatment, compared with SRP alone.
Subject
Periodontics,General Medicine
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献