Farmer‐led badger vaccination in Cornwall: Epidemiological patterns and social perspectives

Author:

Woodroffe Rosie1ORCID,Astley Kelly1,Barnecut Rose2,Brotherton Peter N. M.3ORCID,Donnelly Christl A.45ORCID,Grub Henry M. J.167ORCID,Ham Cally1ORCID,Howe Caroline7ORCID,Jones Chris2,Marriott Cheryl8,Miles Verity156ORCID,Rowcliffe Marcus1ORCID,Shelley Tom8,Truscott Keith2

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Zoology London UK

2. Mid Cornwall Badger Vaccination Farmers Group, c/o Cornwall Wildlife Trust, Five Acres Truro UK

3. Natural England, Quay House Peterborough UK

4. Department of Statistics University of Oxford Oxford UK

5. Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology Imperial College London London UK

6. Science and Solutions for a Changing Planet Doctoral Training Partnership, Grantham Institute Imperial College London UK

7. Centre for Environmental Policy Imperial College London London UK

8. Cornwall Wildlife Trust, Five Acres Truro UK

Abstract

Abstract In the United Kingdom, the management of bovine tuberculosis (bTB) challenges the coexistence of people and wildlife. Control of this cattle disease is hindered by transmission of its causative agent, Mycobacterium bovis, between cattle and badgers Meles meles. Badger culling has formed an element of bTB control policy for decades, but current government policy envisions expanding badger vaccination. Farming leaders are sceptical, citing concerns that badger vaccination would be impractical and potentially ineffective. We report on a 4‐year badger vaccination initiative in an 11 km2 area which, atypically, was initiated by local farmers, delivered by scientists and conservationists, and co‐funded by all three. Participating landholders cited controversies around culling and a desire to support neighbours as their primary reasons for adopting vaccination. The number of badgers vaccinated per km2 (5.6 km−2 in 2019) exceeded the number culled on nearby land (2.9 km−2 in 2019), and the estimated proportion vaccinated (74%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 40%–137%) exceeded the 30% threshold predicted by models to be necessary to control M. bovis. Farmers were content with how vaccination was delivered, and felt that it built trust with wildlife professionals. The percentage of badgers testing positive for M. bovis declined from 16.0% (95% CI 4.5%–36.1%) at the start of vaccination to 0% (95% CI 0%–9.7%) in the final year. With neither replication nor unvaccinated controls, this small‐scale case study does not demonstrate a causal link between badger vaccination and bTB epidemiology, but it does suggest that larger‐scale evaluation of badger vaccination would be warranted. Farmers reported that their enthusiasm for badger vaccination had increased after participating for 4 years. They considered vaccination to have been effective, and good value for money, and wished to continue with it. Synthesis and applications: Although small‐scale, this case study suggests that badger vaccination can be a technically effective and socially acceptable component of bTB control. A wider rollout of badger vaccination is more likely if it is led by the farming community, rather than by conservationists or government, and is combined with scientific monitoring. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Funder

Garfield Weston Foundation

Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, UK Government

Natural England

Natural Environment Research Council

Zoological Society of London

Research England

Public Health England

Publisher

Wiley

Reference75 articles.

1. Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board. (2020).Bovine TB Risk Map for Great Britain.https://tbhub.co.uk/preventing‐tb‐breakdowns/bovine‐tb‐risk‐map/

2. The theory of planned behavior

3. APHA. (2015).Headline statistic on herd incidence: incidents per 100 herd‐years at risk.https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/483724/bovinetb‐herdmethod‐09dec15.pdf

4. APHA. (2016a).APHA report of examination for Mycobacterium bovis in badgers found dead within the Welsh Government Intensive Action Area(IAA) (OG0145/TBOG0146).https://www.tbknowledgeexchange.co.uk/wp‐content/uploads/170508‐bovine‐tb‐badger‐found‐dead‐survey‐report‐4‐en.pdf

5. APHA. (2016b).A descriptive analysis of the effect of badger vaccination on the incidence of bovine tuberculosis in cattle within the Badger Vaccine Deployment Project area using observational data.https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/548140/bvdp‐badger‐vaccine‐report.pdf

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3