Disentangling gender and social difference for just and transformative biocultural approaches

Author:

Díaz‐Reviriego Isabel1,Torralba Mario2ORCID,Vizuete Beatriz3ORCID,Ortiz‐Przychodzka Stefan14,Pearson Jasmine15ORCID,Heindorf Claudia6ORCID,LLanque Zonta Aymara17,Oteros‐Rozas Elisa89

Affiliation:

1. Social‐Ecological Systems Institute (SESI), Faculty of Sustainability Leuphana University of Lüneburg Lüneburg Germany

2. Environmental Geography Group Institute for Environmental Studies, VU University Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands

3. Social‐Ecological Systems Laboratory, Department of Ecology, Faculty of Science Autonomous University of Madrid Madrid Spain

4. Grupo Economía, Ambiente y Alternativas al Desarrollo Universidad Nacional de Colombia Bogotá Colombia

5. School of Architecture and Built Environment, Faculty of Engineering Queensland University of Technology (QUT) Brisbane Queensland Australia

6. Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development University of Göttingen Göttingen Germany

7. Universidad Autónoma del Beni (UAB) Trinidad Bolivia

8. Departmento de Agronomía, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica Universidad de Sevilla Sevilla Spain

9. FRACTAL Collective Madrid Spain

Abstract

Abstract Advancing research and practice that recognize diverse worldviews, knowledge systems, and value orientations is essential to enable transformative change towards sustainability. Biocultural approaches recognize the diverse ways in which people relate to nature, offering a potential pathway for sustainability transformations. However, recent scholarship on biocultural approaches to sustainability has highlighted that social aspects such as equity and justice have not been substantively addressed, whereby gender issues have been overlooked to a great extent. Through qualitative content analysis, this review synthesizes the conceptualizations of gender and social difference within the literature on biocultural approaches to sustainability published in English and Spanish. The biocultural literature predominantly focuses on describing knowledge and management practices, neglecting power and gender relations that affect access and control over resources, and how different axes of social difference matter across different social‐ecological contexts. Overall, we found that gender considerations within the literature reviewed do not build upon feminist and gender theories. Based on these findings, we provide insights into how more nuanced engagements, especially in relation to feminist theories and tools as intersectionality and decolonial perspectives, can allow for more just scholarly efforts to address biocultural relations. Finally, we draw attention to responsible and engaged praxis towards promoting biocultural approaches that include the diverse perspectives of those who can contribute to transformative change, and which prevent the reinforcement of gender‐based power relations. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Funder

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung

Universidad Autónoma de Madrid

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3