Impact of Previous Abdominal Surgery and Timing of Peritoneal Metastases on Accuracy of Imaging in Predicting the Surgical PCI: A Report From the PRECINCT Study

Author:

Bhatt Aditi1ORCID,Rousset Pascal2,Moran Brendan J.3,Kazi Mudaddal4ORCID,Baratti Dario5,Morris David6ORCID,Labow Daniel7,Sardi Armando8ORCID,Sammartino Paolo9,Glehen Olivier10,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgical Oncology Zydus Hospital Ahmedabad India

2. Department of Radiology Centre‐hospitalier Lyon‐sud Lyon France

3. Department of Surgical Oncology Peritoneal Malignancy Institute Basingstoke UK

4. Department of Surgical Oncology Tata Memorial Hospital Mumbai India

5. Department of Surgical Oncology Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori Milan Italy

6. Department of Surgical Oncology St. George Hospital Sydney New South Wales Australia

7. Department of Surgical Oncology Mount Sinai Hospital New York New York USA

8. Department of Surgical Oncology Mercy Medical Centre Baltimore Maryland USA

9. Department of Surgical Oncology Sapienza University of Rome Rome Italy

10. Department of Surgical Oncology Centre Hospitalier Lyon‐sud Lyon France

Abstract

ABSTRACTBackground and AimIn this report from Phase 1 of the prospective, observational, PRECINCT (Pattern of peritoneal dissemination and REsponse to systemic Chemotherapy IN Common and uncommon peritoneal Tumours) study, a correlation was performed between the radiological PCI (peritoneal cancer index; rPCI) and surgical PCI (sPCI). The impact of timing of peritoneal malignancy (PM) and previous abdominal surgery was also studied.MethodsThe rPCI and sPCI were considered the ‘same’ if they differed by ≤ 3 points. The agreement was assessed using Bland–Altman analysis and the strength of the agreement was assessed using the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). The extent of prior surgery was classified according to prior surgical score (PSS).ResultsIn 707 (79.4%) patients, rPCI and sPCI concurred in 280 (39.6%). In the Bland–Altman analysis, < 40% patients were in the ±3 PCI points limit of acceptable difference. The average difference between the two scores was 4.5 points (95% CI‐ −5.16 to −3.92). The CCC‐ was 0.59 for the whole cohort (‘moderate’ concordance) and was not influenced by imaging modality, timing of PM or PSS.ConclusionsThe rPCI underestimated sPCI by an average of 4.5 points. The role of peritoneal MRI in patients undergoing iterative procedures and the performance of imaging according to sites of recurrence need further evaluation.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3