Affiliation:
1. Department of Philosophy University of Amsterdam
Abstract
AbstractSheldon Pollock's justly famous work on cosmopolitan orders and processes of vernacularization in the worlds of Latinity and Sanskrit invites questions of a comparative and global‐historical character. I will raise such questions in the context of the Persianate cosmopolitan order, especially as exemplified by the early modern Ottoman Empire, focusing on the wave of vernacularizations this empire witnessed in the seventeenth–eighteenth centuries. In this process of vernacularization, new vernacular forms of philological learning appear to have played a crucial role. Building on Bourdieu's work, I will try to analyze the Ottoman cosmopolitan as a pre‐modern form of linguistic domination, and vernacularization as a form of resistance. Moving beyond Bourdieu, I will be arguing for a genealogical approach that is alive to premodern non‐European philological traditions, and to the historically variable relation between (philological) knowledge and power.
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,History
Reference33 articles.
1. Agop Ioannis [Hovannes Holov] Puritas haygica seu grammatica armenica(Rome Typis Sacrae Congregationis de Propaganda Fide 1675).
2. Bourdieu Pierre Language & Symbolic Power(Cambridge: Polity 1991).
3. Bourdieu Pierre The Rules of Art: Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field(Cambridge: Polity 1996).
4. Casanova Pascale The World Republic of Letters(Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press 2004).
5. Casanova Pascale La langue mondiale: Traduction et domination(Paris: Seuil 2015).