Affiliation:
1. Institut für Geschichte der Medizin und Ethik in der Medizin Zentrum für Human- und Gesundheitswissenschaften (CC1) Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Abstract
AbstractFor some years now, there has been a dispute in Berlin Pankow about renaming the “Robert‐Rössle‐Straße.” The pathologist is accused of an opportunistic attitude regarding his behaviour and his scientific work under National Socialism. In his research, especially that on a “pathology of the family,” Robert Rössle is said to have followed the racial‐hygienic paradigm of the Nazi era. He is to have used questionable methods and is subject to the reproach of having profited from his adaptation to the system scientifically and as a private citizen. The dispute over the naming of the street can be described as “dissonant memory,” impeding a harmonious culture of remembrance. It is suggested that this dispute – regardless of whether the street is renamed or not – be used productively in the sense of a reflexive historical consciousness to get on Rössle's track and illuminate the factual and personal entanglements of his network from different perspectives.
Reference53 articles.
1. Baumann Timo Pathologie und Pathologen im Nationalsozialismus(Herne: Frischtexte 2021).
2. Bielka Heinz Beiträge zur Geschichte der Medizinisch-Biologischen Institute in Berlin-Buch 1933–1995(Berlin: Max-Delbrück-Centrum für Molekulare Medizin 1992).
3. Bielka Heinz Streifzüge durch die Orts- und Medizingeschichte von Berlin-Buch 2. Aufl. (Berlin: Frieling-Verlag 2011).
4. Czech Herwig et al. „The Lancet Commission on Medicine Nazism and the Holocaust: Historical Evidence Implications for Today Teaching for Tomorrow“ The Lancet402 (2023): 1867–1940 online:https://www.thelancet.com/action/showPdf?pii=S0140-6736%2823%2901845-7(aufgerufen am 1. März 2024).
5. David Heinz „Zur Erinnerung an Robert Rössle anläßlich seines 25. Todestages“ Charité-AnnalenNF 10 (1990): 299–303.