Science in Community: Anatomy, Academy, and Argument in the Eighteenth‐Century Holy Roman Empire**

Author:

Böttcher Julia Carina1

Affiliation:

1. FAU Kompetenzzentrum für interdisziplinäre Wissenschaftsreflexion Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg Bismarckstr. 12 D 91054 Erlangen

Abstract

AbstractUnderstanding physicians as actors who implemented the early modern ideal of collective empiricism into their practices within the local contexts of everyday life, the paper explores two cases from imperial cities in southern Germany in the 1720s and 1780s in which anatomical studies were contested. By analyzing the strategies and arguments that the two physicians used to justify and continue their anatomical dissections, it focuses on their references to different kinds of (local) community and relates these references to another type of collective: membership in a scientific academy. To examine references to community, it is proposed, offers an opportunity to better understand the spread and practice of the ideal of the study of nature as a collective project and how it was intertwined with concepts and structures of order and society in the Holy Roman Empire.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference35 articles.

1. Acta Physico-Medica Academiae Leopoldino-Carolinae Naturae Curiosorum exhibentia Ephemerides: Volumen Secundum(Nuremberg: Adelbulner Endter and Engelbrecht 1730).

2. Barnett Frances Mason “Medical Authority and Princely Patronage: The Academia Naturae Curiosorum 1652–1693” (PhD thesis University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 1995).

3. Boniakowski Eduard “Der Regensburger Stadtarzt und Apotheker Dr. Johann Gottlieb Schäffer (1720–1795): Leben und Werk” (PhD med. thesis University of Regensburg 2006).

4. Böttcher Julia Carina “Wissenschaft – Praxis – Politik. Zum Handlungsmuster naturforschender Ärzte im 17. und 18. Jahrhundert ” inWissenschaftsreflexion: Interdisziplinäre Perspektiven zwischen Philosophie und Praxis ed. Michael Jungert Andreas Frewer and Erasmus Mayr (Paderborn: Brill | mentis 2020) 199–229.

5. Rethinking Professionalization: Theory, Practice, and Professional Ideology in Eighteenth-Century German Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3