Affiliation:
1. Agronomy College Qingdao Agricultural University Qingdao Shandong PR China
2. School of Ecology and Nature Conservation Beijing Forestry University Beijing PR China
3. Department of Ecosystem Science and Sustainability, Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory Colorado State University Fort Collins Colorado USA
4. Rocky Mountain Research Station, USDA Forest Service Fort Collins Colorado USA
5. College of Agriculture and Life Sciences Kunming University Kunming PR China
Abstract
AbstractCategorization of soil organic carbon (SOC) into different functional subpools according to their recalcitrance and protective mechanisms helps better understand ecosystems organic carbon (OC) dynamics, and various attempts have been made to explore the suitable experimental fractionation method for such purpose. However, most previous studies neglected the influences of environmental factors on the effectiveness of varying fractionation methods. Density fractionation has shown great promise in elucidating SOC immobilization mechanisms. Here, we compared three varying types of density fractionation methods (density, density + dispersion, and density + other procedures) for categorizing the SOC into three functional pools, that is, active OC (OCactive), moderately stable OC (OCm‐stable), and stable OC, (OCstable) using global data compiled for 95 sites in 31 published studies, and examined the influences of climate (mean annual temperature [MAT] and annual precipitation), vegetation type, and soil properties (soil depth, clay content, and soil type) on SOC fractions determined by the three density fractionation methods. The percentage of OCm‐stable fraction was found to be highest using the density method and lowest using the density + dispersion method, due to differential density ranges between the two methods. At a global scale, the contents of total SOC and its OC fractions decreased with temperature. Precipitation had no apparent influences on the subdivided SOC fractions using either the density + dispersion method or the method of density + other procedures, whereas soil type constrained the effect of precipitation on SOC fractions using the density method. The percentage of OCm‐stable determined by the density + dispersion method was more responsive to MAT and vegetation type than that by the other two methods. The percentage of OCstable determined by the method of density + other procedures was significantly and positively related to the clay content as the OCstable based on this method included small particles. For all the three methods of fractionation, soil type had a greater influence than the clay content on the SOC fractions, especially the OCm‐stable and the OCstable. For soil type characterized by rich metal oxides, both the density method and the method of density + other procedures could be used for SOC fractionation. For soil type rich in nutrients, the density + dispersion method would have higher sensitivity for distinguishing the OCm‐stable.
Funder
Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province
Subject
Soil Science,General Environmental Science,Development,Environmental Chemistry
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献