Genetic counselors' utilization of ChatGPT in professional practice: A cross‐sectional study

Author:

Ahimaz Priyanka12ORCID,Bergner Amanda L.134,Florido Michelle E.13,Harkavy Nina15,Bhattacharyya Sriya16

Affiliation:

1. Genetic Counseling Graduate Program, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons Columbia University New York New York USA

2. Department of Pediatrics, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons Columbia University New York New York USA

3. Department of Genetics and Development, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons Columbia University New York New York USA

4. Department of Neurology, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons Columbia University New York New York USA

5. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons Columbia University New York New York USA

6. Department of Psychiatry, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons Columbia University New York New York USA

Abstract

AbstractPurposeThe precision medicine era has seen increased utilization of artificial intelligence (AI) in the field of genetics. We sought to explore the ways that genetic counselors (GCs) currently use the publicly accessible AI tool Chat Generative Pre‐trained Transformer (ChatGPT) in their work.MethodsGCs in North America were surveyed about how ChatGPT is used in different aspects of their work. Descriptive statistics were reported through frequencies and means.ResultsOf 118 GCs who completed the survey, 33.8% (40) reported using ChatGPT in their work; 47.5% (19) use it in clinical practice, 35% (14) use it in education, and 32.5% (13) use it in research. Most GCs (62.7%; 74) felt that it saves time on administrative tasks but the majority (82.2%; 97) felt that a paramount challenge was the risk of obtaining incorrect information. The majority of GCs not using ChatGPT (58.9%; 46) felt it was not necessary for their work.ConclusionA considerable number of GCs in the field are using ChatGPT in different ways, but it is primarily helpful with tasks that involve writing. It has potential to streamline workflow issues encountered in clinical genetics, but practitioners need to be informed and uniformly trained about its limitations.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Genetics (clinical),Genetics

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3