Differences in digital prenatal service utilization by self‐reported race

Author:

Peahl Alex1ORCID,Jahnke Hannah R.2ORCID,Rubin‐Miller Lily2ORCID,Henrich Natalie2ORCID,Shah Neel23ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology University of Michigan, L4001 Women's Hospital Ann Arbor Michigan USA

2. Maven Clinic New York New York USA

3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Boston Massachusetts USA

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveThe objective of this study was to understand the use of supplemental digital prenatal services by race and ethnicity among pregnant people utilizing a comprehensive, employer‐sponsored digital health platform.Materials and MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of pregnant people enrolled in a comprehensive, employer‐sponsored digital health platform, assessing utilization of app‐based supplemental digital prenatal services by race and ethnicity. Care utilization included three categories: asynchronous utilization (e.g., article reads, videos); interactions with a care advocate, a trained care navigator; and provider interactions (e.g., messages and visits with a medical provider). Differences in service utilization by race and ethnicity were assessed using basic descriptive statistics with between‐group comparisons.ResultsOf 5662 users, 2362 (41.7%) were White, 266 (4.7%) were Black, and 1411 (24.9%) reported ‘prefer not to say’ for their race. More Black and Asian users sent messages to a provider and had provider appointments than White and Hispanic users (messages: White: 33.7%, Hispanic: 33.6%, Asian: 44.9%, Black: 45.1%, p < 0.001; provider appointments: White: 49.8%, Hispanic: 43.3%, Asian: 52.4%, Black: 46.2%, p < 0.001). More Black users accessed doula and mental health appointments than other racial groups.ConclusionsOur study demonstrates that pregnant people of historically marginalized groups use digital supplemental prenatal services as much or more than White patients. Digital prenatal services may be a promising avenue for improving care access and experience for patient groups that face the biggest barriers to care and worst maternity care outcomes.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3