Design and field procedures for the clinical reappraisal of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview version 3.3 in Qatar's national mental health study

Author:

Amro Iman1ORCID,Ali Amal1,Hassan Mohamed H. M. O.2ORCID,Al Shawwaf Mahmoud2,Alhassan Ahmed2,Al Bahari Dalia2,El Fakki Hana2,Hijawi Zainab2,Aly Sheeren2,Amin Asmaa2,Mohammed Rumaisa2,Nofal Marwa2,Abdelkader Menatalla2,Salman Salma2,Currie James2,Alabdulla Majid2,Sampson Nancy A.3,First Michael4,Kessler Ronald C.3ORCID,Woodruff Peter W.5,Khaled Salma M.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Social and Economic Survey Research Institute Qatar University Doha Qatar

2. Hamad Medical Corporation Doha Qatar

3. Department of Health Care Policy Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA

4. Columbia University Department of Psychiatry New York New York USA

5. University of Sheffield Sheffield UK

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThe Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) has been clinically reappraised in several studies conducted mainly in the US and Europe. This report describes the methodology used to conduct one of the Middle East's largest clinical reappraisal studies. The study was carried out in conjunction with the World Mental Health Qatar—the first national psychiatric epidemiological study of common mental disorders in the country. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic consistency of core modules of the newly translated and adapted Arabic version of the CIDI 5.0 against the independent clinical diagnoses based on the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM‐5 (SCID‐5).MethodsTelephone follow‐up interviews were administered by trained clinicians using the latest research edition of the SCID for DSM‐5. Telephone administered interviews were key in the data collection, as the study took place during the COVID‐19 pandemic.ResultsOverall, within 12 months, 485 interviews were completed. The response rate was 52%. Quality control monitoring documented excellent adherence of clinical interviews to the rating protocol.ConclusionsThe overall methods used in this study proved to be efficient and effective. For future research, instrument cultural adaptation within the cultural context is highly recommended.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health

Reference31 articles.

1. Access.(2016).Create a database in Access—Microsoft Support.https://support.microsoft.com/en‐us/office/create‐a‐database‐in‐access‐f200d95b‐e429‐4acc‐98c1‐b883d4e9fc0a

2. Twelve‐month treatment of mental disorders in the Saudi National Mental Health Survey

3. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

4. APA ‐ The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM‐5®. (n.d.). Retrieved July 20 2022 fromhttps://www.appi.org/products/structured‐clinical‐interview‐for‐dsm‐5‐scid‐5

5. Translation in Arabic, adaptation and validation of the SF-36 Health Survey for use in Tunisia

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3