Affiliation:
1. Clinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica 2 IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli Bologna Italy
2. Applied and Translational Research (ATR) Center IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli Bologna Italy
3. Faculty of Biomedical Sciences Università della Svizzera Italiana Lugano Switzerland
Abstract
AbstractPurposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate if the operated knee environment remains abnormal in patients successfully treated with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL‐R).MethodsThirty asymptomatic patients were enrolled (28 men, 2 women, age 28.6 ± 6.54 years, body mass index: 24.9 ± 3.0 kg/m2) and evaluated at 42.2 ± 12.5 months after surgery. Patients were assessed with patient‐reported outcome measurements and with a triaxial accelerometer. The temperature of the knees as well as four regions of interest were evaluated with an infrared thermographic camera FLIR T1020 (FLIR® Systems) according to a standardised protocol including a baseline evaluation and further evaluations immediately after exercise and after 5, 10 and 20 min. The temperature of the ACL‐R knee was compared to that of the contralateral healthy knee for the purpose of the study.ResultsThe mean temperature of the knee was higher (p = 0.010) for the ACL‐R knees (31.4 ± 1.4°C) compared to the healthy knees (31.1 ± 1.6°C), as well as for the patellar area (p = 0.005), the lateral area (p = 0.016) and the medial area (p = 0.014). The analysis of the response to the exercises of the ACL‐R knees showed similar trends to the healthy knees but higher temperature values at all time points (p < 0.05). Patients who underwent ACL‐R with concomitant meniscal treatment showed higher knee temperatures compared to ACL‐R knees without concomitant meniscal treatment after 5 (p = 0.047), 10 (p = 0.027) and 20 min (p = 0.048).ConclusionsThe temperature of asymptomatic knees previously treated with ACL‐R is higher than the contralateral healthy knee, both at rest and after exercise, with a further increase in knees that underwent both ACL‐R and meniscal treatment. These results suggest an inflammatory state persisting years after the surgery, which could predispose to the early onset of knee degeneration.Level of EvidenceIII, Case–control study.