Feasibility of 3D MRI fingerprinting for rapid knee cartilage T1, T2, and T mapping at 0.55T: Comparison with 3T

Author:

De Moura Hector L.1ORCID,Monga Anmol1,Zhang Xiaoxia1,Zibetti Marcelo V. W.1,Keerthivasan Mahesh B.2,Regatte Ravinder R.1

Affiliation:

1. Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology New York University Grossman School of Medicine New York New York USA

2. Siemens Medical Solutions USA Inc Malvern Pennsylvania USA

Abstract

AbstractLow‐field strength scanners present an opportunity for more inclusive imaging exams and bring several challenges including lower signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) and longer scan times. Magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) is a rapid quantitative multiparametric method that can enable multiple quantitative maps simultaneously. To demonstrate the feasibility of an MRF sequence for knee cartilage evaluation in a 0.55T system we performed repeatability and accuracy experiments with agar‐gel phantoms. Additionally, five healthy volunteers (age 32 ± 4 years old, 2 females) were scanned at 3T and 0.55T. The MRI acquisition protocols include a stack‐of‐stars T‐enabled MRF sequence, a VIBE sequence with variable flip angles (VFA) for T1 mapping, and fat‐suppressed turbo flash (TFL) sequences for T2 and T mappings. Double‐Echo steady‐state (DESS) sequence was also used for cartilage segmentation. Acquisitions were performed at two different field strengths, 0.55T and 3T, with the same sequences but protocols were slightly different to accommodate differences in signal‐to‐noise ratio and relaxation times. Cartilage segmentation was done using five compartments. T1, T2, and T values were measured in the knee cartilage using both MRF and conventional relaxometry sequences. The MRF sequence demonstrated excellent repeatability in a test–retest experiment with model agar‐gel phantoms, as demonstrated with correlation and Bland–Altman plots. Underestimation of T1 values was observed on both field strengths, with the average global difference between reference values and the MRF being 151 ms at 0.55T and 337 ms at 3T. At 0.55T, MRF measurements presented significant biases but strong correlations with the reference measurements. Although a larger error was present in T1 measurements, MRF measurements trended similarly to the conventional measurements for human subjects and model agar‐gel phantoms.

Funder

National Institutes of Health

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3