Doing epistemic justice in sustainable development: Applying the philosophical concept of epistemic injustice to the real world

Author:

Cummings Sarah1ORCID,Dhewa Charles12,Kemboi Gladys13,Young Stacey4

Affiliation:

1. Knowledge, Technology and Innovation Wageningen University & Research, Social Sciences Group Wageningen The Netherlands

2. Knowledge Transfer Africa Harare Zimbabwe

3. JHPIEGO Nairobi Kenya

4. US Agency for International Development Washington District of Columbia USA

Abstract

AbstractOriginally conceptualized by the philosopher, Miranda Fricker, epistemic injustice—unfair treatment of individuals and groups in knowledge‐related and communicative practices—is increasingly being employed to delineate individual and collective injustice in healthcare, information sciences, education and sustainable development. Embedded in many other forms of social injustice and inequality, epistemic injustice is a particularly serious problem for sustainable development, undermining the global community's ability to deal with ‘wicked’ problems. Building on the more conceptually developed, philosophical framework of epistemic injustice and recent research from other fields, this article develops a holistic action‐oriented framework of epistemic justice, namely fair treatment in knowledge‐related and communicative practices, for sustainable development and beyond. It also adds to the current framework of individual and collective injustice by including a range of new insights on structural and systemic epistemic injustice, such as linguistic injustice and epistemicide.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Development,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Reference89 articles.

1. Alvarez‐Pereira C. Blumenthal H. Crowley J. Denis M. deOliveira Pinto T. El Guindi F. Jacobs G. Kauffman J. Leach M. Leiner M. Möller L. Oosterbeek L. Ramphele M. Reuter T. Rosa H. Shrivastava P. Šmon B. Snick A. …Wesche T.(2021).Jena declaration on cultural and regional dimensions of global sustainability. 18 March 2021.

2. Epistemic Justice as a Virtue of Social Institutions

3. The challenging role of researchers coping with tensions, dilemmas and paradoxes in transdisciplinary settings

4. Babbie E.(2013).Social research counts. Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

5. The energy‐extractives nexus and the just transition

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3