Affiliation:
1. Costa Rican Birth Defects Register Center (CREC), Costa Rican Institute of Research and Education in Nutrition and Health (INCIENSA) Cartago Costa Rica
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundWe aimed to analyze the prevalence and trend of birth defects (BDs) in Costa Rica, where BDs are the second leading cause of infant and under‐five mortality.MethodsA descriptive analysis of selected BDs prevalence and trends from 2000 to 2019 was performed, based on data from the Costa Rican Birth Defects Register Center, the national BDs surveillance system with coverage of 98% of live births in the country. We used Joinpoint regression to identify any calendar year where a significant change in trend occurred; the annual percent change (APC) and the average annual percent change (AAPC) were determined. Marginal means and prevalence ratios by subperiod (2000–2009 as referent and 2010–2019) were estimated using Poisson regression, and compared using Wald's chi‐square tests (alpha ≤0.05).ResultsFrom 2000 to 2019, BDs occurred in 2.3% of live births (95% CI: 2.3–2.4); 73% of which were major BDs. Males presented a significantly higher prevalence (sex ratio 1.13 males/females). The trend showed an AAPC of +3.7 (p < .05) with two joinpoints, 2005 and 2013. A significant APC (+11.3) was observed during 2005–2013, within the context of improvements in the surveillance system, such as the increase in the reporting age, and the incorporation of other data sources in addition to maternity hospitals. Most of the BDs groups presented a significant upward trend. The highest AAPC was observed for the respiratory system (+11.7), congenital heart defects (+9.5), and nervous system (+8.5).ConclusionsThe BDs present a clear upward trend in the last two decades due, among other things, to a significant improvement in the surveillance system.
Subject
Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Developmental Biology,Toxicology,Embryology,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献