Narrative synthesis of the effectiveness and characteristics of heart failure disease self‐management support programmes

Abstract

AbstractA deeper understanding of the key elements that should be included in heart failure (HF) disease self‐management support (DSMS) programmes is crucial to enhance programme effectiveness and applicability to diverse settings. We investigated the characteristics and effectiveness of DSMS programmes designed to improve survival and decrease acute care readmissions for people with HF and determine the generalizability and applicability of the evidence to low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs). A narrative meta‐synthesis approach was used, and systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of DSMS programmes were included. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, MEDLINE, and Embase were searched without language restriction and guided by the adapted Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses. Eight high‐quality systematic reviews were identified representing 250 studies, of which 138 were unique RCTs measuring the outcomes of interest. The findings revealed statistically significant reductions in HF readmissions [relative risk (RR) range 0.64–0.85, P < 0.5, five out of six reviews], all‐cause readmissions (RR range 0.85–0.95, P < 0.5, five out of six reviews), and all‐cause mortality (RR range 0.67–0.87, P < 0.5, five out of five reviews). Overall, 44.2% (n = 61) of RCTs reduced acute care readmission and improved survival. Studies were categorized according to intensity (low, moderate, moderate+, and high) based on the opportunity for immediate treatment of HF instability; 29.2% (14/48) of low‐intensity, 63.6% (21/33) of moderate‐intensity, 40% (6/15) of moderate+‐intensity, and 47.6% (20/42) of high‐intensity interventions were effective. Most effective programmes used moderate‐intensity (39.4%, 48%, or 50%, respectively) or high‐intensity (33.3%, 36%, and 43.7%, respectively) interventions. The majority of studies (90.6%) were conducted in high‐income countries. Programmes that provided opportunities for early recognition and response to HF instability were more likely to reduce acute care readmission and enhance survival. Generalizability and applicability to LMICs are clearly limited. Tailoring HF DSMS programmes to accommodate cultural, resource, and environmental challenges requires careful consideration of intervention intensity, duration of follow‐up, and feasibility in low‐resource settings.