Laparoscopic adjustable gastric band survival in a high-volume bariatric unit

Author:

Brown J J S1,Boyle M1,Mahawar K1,Balupuri S1,Small P K1

Affiliation:

1. Bariatric Surgery Unit, Sunderland Hospital, Sunderland, UK

Abstract

Abstract Background Although laparoscopic adjustable gastric bands (LAGBs) have been shown to be efficacious, their long-term usefulness has been questioned. This study examined the fate of LAGBs in a unit with over a decade of experience in their use. Patient factors related to the need for, and timing of, band removal were investigated. Methods A prospectively maintained database was used to identify all patients with a LAGB. Patient demographics, need for band removal and band survival were examined. Logistic regression modelling was done and Kaplan–Meier curves were calculated for band survival. Results Between 2000 and 2012, 674 bands were placed in 665 patients. Of these, 143 (21·2 per cent) were removed. There was no difference in rates of removal by sex (P = 0·910). The highest rates of removal were in patients aged less than 40 years (26·7 per cent), and those with a BMI greater than 60 kg/m2 (28·6 per cent). Earlier band removal was seen in younger patients (P = 0·002). Rates of removal increased linearly by earlier year of placement. Of bands placed 4 or more years previously, 35·0 per cent required removal. Eighty-three patients (58·0 per cent) who had a LAGB removed went on to have a further bariatric procedure (band to bypass, 66; band to sleeve, 17). Conclusion Even in experienced hands LAGB does not appear to be a definitive solution. In a large number of patients there appears to be a finite ‘band life’, with the majority of patients requiring conversion to a further bariatric procedure. Presented in part to a meeting of the British Obesity and Metabolic Surgery Society, Glasgow, UK, January 2013, as an oral presentation for which it was awarded the council prize; published in abstract form as Br J Surg 2013; 100(Suppl 3): 2

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3