Understanding the experiences and perspectives of prenatal screening among a diverse cohort

Author:

Riches Naomi O.1ORCID,Johnson Erin P.1,Subramaniam Akila2,Vora Neeta L.3ORCID,Hardisty Emily3,LaRiviere Kate4,Rothwell Erin15

Affiliation:

1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology University of Utah School of Medicine Salt Lake City Utah USA

2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Center for Women's Reproductive Health Division of Maternal and Fetal Medicine University of Alabama Birmingham Alabama USA

3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine University of North Carolina Chapel Hill North Carolina USA

4. University of Utah School of Medicine Salt Lake City Utah USA

5. University of Utah Interim Vice President for Research Salt Lake City Utah USA

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionRapid advances in prenatal genetic screening technology make it difficult for providers to deliver adequate prenatal counseling. The aim of this study was to understand how prenatal screening educational approaches can meet the needs of patients.MethodsQualitative content analysis was conducted on a diverse population who were interviewed to explore their perceived experiences and preferences for prenatal screening educational delivery.ResultsTwenty‐two women from three US sites were interviewed. Participants were racially/ethnically diverse with 22.7% identifying as Black or African American (n = 5), 40.9% as Hispanic (n = 9), and 4.5% as Pacific Islander (n = 1). Four themes were identified: prenatal screening education, prenatal screening decision‐making, return of results, and suggestions for creating a decision aid. Most results were consistent with previous research not targeting a diverse population.Discussion/ConclusionOur results indicate that learning style preferences vary between patients and that current methods are not consistently satisfying patient's desire for understanding, particularly with ‘high‐risk’ results, suggesting that a standardized tool could improve knowledge and decrease decisional conflict. This diverse cohort suggested a list and description of each of the testing options offered, information about each condition being screened for, a timeline for the testing and return of results, costs associated, and non‐technical language.

Funder

National Human Genome Research Institute

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Genetics (clinical),Obstetrics and Gynecology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3