Affiliation:
1. College of Information and Electrical Engineering Shenyang Agricultural University Shenyang China
2. Liaoning Engineering Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture Shenyang China
3. Key Laboratory of Fruit Postharvest Biology, Liaoning Province; College of Horticulture Shenyang Agricultural University Shenyang China
4. College of Electronic Engineering South China Agricultural University Guangzhou China
5. National Center for International Collaboration Research on Precision Agricultural Aviation Pesticides Spraying Technology South China Agricultural University Guangzhou China
Abstract
AbstractBACKGROUNDNanguo pear is a distinctive pear variety in northeast China, grown mainly in mountainous areas. Due to terrain limitations, ground‐based pesticide application equipment is difficult to use. This limitation could be overcome by using unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for pesticide application in Nanguo pear orchards. This study evaluated the spraying performance of two UAVs in the Nanguo pear orchards and compared them with a manually used backpack electric sprayer (BES). The study also analyzed the effect of canopy size on droplet deposition and ground loss, and evaluated two sampling methods, leaf sampling and telescopic rod sampling.RESULTSCompared to BESs, droplet deposition is lower for UAVs, but the actual pesticide active ingredient deposition is not necessarily lower given the solution concentration. The droplet deposition varies among different UAVs due to structural differences. Under the same UAV operating parameters, droplet deposition on trees with smaller canopy sizes is typically greater than that on trees with larger canopy sizes, and the ground loss was also more severe. Although telescopic rod sampling is a quick and convenient method, it can only reflect the trend of droplet deposition, and the data error is greater compared with leaf sampling.CONCLUSIONUAVs can achieve better droplet deposition in mountainous Nanguo pear orchards and does almost no harm to the operators compared with the BES. However, canopy size needs to be considered to adjust the application volume rate. Telescopic rods can be used for qualitative analyses, but are not recommended for quantitative analyses. © 2024 Society of Chemical Industry.
Funder
Higher Education Discipline Innovation Project
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献