Quality of written record following mock eyewitness testimony: Note taking should be a minimum standard!-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Quality of written record following mock eyewitness testimony: Note taking should be a minimum standard!

Published:2019-02-04 Issue:2 Volume:16 Page:124-137
ISSN:1544-4759
Container-title:Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling
language:en
Short-container-title:J Investig Psychol Offender Profil

Author:

Meise Jessica¹^ORCID,Leue Anja¹^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute of PsychologyUniversity of Kiel Kiel Germany

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Applied Psychology,Social Psychology

Link

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/jip.1522

Reference48 articles.

1. Aamodt M. G.&Richardson M. E.(1995).Individual differences in the accuracy of eyewitness testimonyPaper presented at the annual meeting of the society of Police and Criminal Psychology Honolulu Hawaii October 27. Retrieved fromhttp://maamodt.asp.radford.edu/Research%20‐%20Forensic/Aamodt%20%281995%29%20‐%20SPCP%20‐%20Hawaii%20‐%20Eyewitness%20Testimony.pdfAccessed 28.06.2016

2. The Effect of Encoding and an External Memory Device on Note Taking

4. Police interrogation practice in Slovenia

5. Austrian Code of criminal procedure.2016. Retrieved fromhttps://www.ris.bka.gv.at/GeltendeFassung.wxe?Abfrage=Bundesnormen&Gesetzesnummer=10002326Accessed 29.09.2016

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A meta-analysis on study and sample characteristics modulating mock earwitness performance;Psychological Research;2024-07-03

2. Written Records Quality of a Mock Witness Statement: Effects of Verbal Memory Ability, Note Taking Style and Note Taking Option;J FOREN PSYCHOL RES;2021