Microcalcification detectability in breast CT images using CNN observers

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundBreast computed tomography (CT) is an emerging breast imaging modality, and ongoing developments aim to improve breast CT's ability to detect microcalcifications. To understand the effects of different parameters on microcalcification detectability, a virtual clinical trial study was conducted using hybrid images and convolutional neural network (CNN)‐based model observers. Mathematically generated microcalcifications were embedded into breast CT data sets acquired at our institution, and parameters related to calcification size, calcification contrast, cluster diameter, cluster density, and image display method (i.e., single slices, slice averaging, and maximum‐intensity projections) were evaluated for their influence on microcalcification detectability.PurposeTo investigate the individual effects and the interplay of parameters affecting microcalcification detectability in breast CT.MethodsSpherical microcalcifications of varying diameters (0.04, 0.10, 0.15, 0.20, 0.25, 0.30, 0.35, 0.40 mm) and native intensities were computer simulated to portray the partial volume effects of the imaging system. Calcifications were mathematically embedded into 109 patient breast CT volume data sets as individual calcifications or as clusters of calcifications. Six numbers of calcifications (1, 3, 5, 7, 10, 15) distributed within six cluster diameters (1, 3, 5, 6, 8, 10 mm) were simulated to study the effect of cluster density. To study the role of image display method, 2D regions of interest (ROIs) and 3D volumes of interest (VOIs) were generated using single slice extraction, slice averaging, and maximum‐intensity projection (MIP). 2D and 3D CNNs were trained on the ROIs and VOIs, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate detection performance. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was used as the primary performance metric.ResultsDetection performance decreased with increasing section thickness, and peak detection performance occurred using the native section thickness (0.2 mm) and MIP display. The MIP display method, despite using a single slice, yielded comparable performance to the native section thickness, which employed 50 slices. Reduction in slices did not sacrifice detection accuracy and provided significant computational advantages over multi‐slice image volumes. Larger cluster diameters resulted in reduced overall detectability, while smaller cluster diameters led to increased detectability. Additionally, we observed that the presence of more calcifications within a cluster improved the overall detectability, while fewer calcifications decreased it.ConclusionsAs breast CT is still a relatively new breast imaging modality, there is an ongoing need to identify optimal imaging protocols. This work demonstrated the utility of MIP presentation for displaying image volumes containing microcalcification clusters. It is likely that human observers may also benefit from viewing MIPs compared to individual slices. The results of this investigation begin to elucidate how model observers interact with microcalcification clusters in a 3D volume, and will be useful for future studies investigating a broader set of parameters related to breast CT.