Barriers to colonoscopy in UK colorectal cancer screening programmes: Qualitative interviews with ethnic minority groups

Author:

Kerrison Robert S.1ORCID,Gil Natalie1,Travis Elizabeth2ORCID,Jones Robyn3ORCID,Whitaker Katriina L.1ORCID,Rees Colin4,Duffy Stephen5,von Wagner Christian3

Affiliation:

1. School of Health Sciences University of Surrey Surrey UK

2. School of Psychology University of Leeds Leeds UK

3. Department of Behavioural Science and Health University College London London UK

4. Faculty of Medical Sciences Newcastle University Newcastle UK

5. Wolfson Institute of Population Health Queen Mary University London London UK

Abstract

AbstractObjectivePeople from ethnic minority backgrounds are less likely to attend colonoscopy, following faecal immunochemical test screening, and are more likely to be diagnosed with colorectal cancer at an advanced stage as a result. The aim of this research was to explore the barriers and facilitators to attending colonoscopy, perceived by ethnic minority groups living in the United Kingdom.MethodsSemi‐structured online and telephone interviews were conducted with thirty men and women of Black‐African (n = 5), Black‐Caribbean (n = 5), South Asian (n = 10) and White British (n = 10) descent. Participants were eligible for screening, but had not necessarily been invited for colonoscopy. All interviews were conducted in the participant's first language and were assessed using Framework‐analysis, in line with a conceptual framework developed from previous interviews with healthcare professionals.ResultsFive thematic groups of barriers and facilitators were developed: ‘Locus of control’,Cultural attitudes and beliefs’, ‘Individual beliefs, knowledge and personal experiences with colonoscopy and cancer’, ‘Reliance on family and friends’ and ‘Health concerns’. Differences were observed, between ethnic groups, for: ‘Locus of control’, ‘Cultural attitudes and beliefs’ and ‘Reliance on family and friends’. Black and South Asian participants frequently described the decision to attend colonoscopy as lying with ‘God’ (Muslims, specifically), ‘the doctor’, or ‘family’ (Locus of control). Black and South Asian participants also reported relying on friends and family for ‘language, transport and emotional support’ (Reliance on family and friends). Black‐African participants, specifically, described cancer as ‘socially taboo’ (Cultural attitudes and beliefs).ConclusionsThe results highlight several targets for culturally‐tailored interventions to make colonoscopy more equitable.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Oncology,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3