Identifying the drivers of overall rating of cancer care: Insights from the second wave of the Swiss Cancer Patient Experiences study

Author:

Jolidon Vladimir1ORCID,Eicher Manuela23,Peytremann‐Bridevaux Isabelle1,Aebi Stefan4,Anchisi Sandro5ORCID,Bettini Adrienne6,Chalandon Yves7ORCID,Dietrich Pierre‐Yves7,Duchosal Michel A.8,Dürr Donat9,Peters Solange3,von Moos Roger10,Wicki Andreas11,Arditi Chantal1

Affiliation:

1. Unisanté Center for Primary Care and Public Health, Department of Epidemiology and Health Systems University of Lausanne Lausanne Switzerland

2. Institute of Higher Education and Research in Healthcare Faculty of Biology and Medicine University of Lausanne Lausanne Switzerland

3. Department of Oncology Lausanne University Hospital Lausanne Switzerland

4. Division of Medical Oncology Cantonal Hospital Lucerne and University of Bern Switzerland

5. Oncology Service Hospital Center of Valais Romand Hôpital du Valais Sion Switzerland

6. Oncology Service Fribourg Cantonal Hospital Fribourg Switzerland

7. Department of Oncology Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine University of Geneva Geneva Switzerland

8. Service of Hematology Department of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital Lausanne Switzerland

9. Department of Oncology Zuger Kantonsspital Baar Switzerland

10. Medical Oncology/Hematology Cantonal Hospital Graubünden Chur Switzerland

11. Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundPatient experience surveys gather information on various aspects of care via numerous survey items. Identifying the most critical areas of patient experience to prioritize for quality care improvement can be challenging. The objective of this study was to determine which care experience items are the drivers influencing patients' overall rating of cancer care.MethodsData from 2750 adult patients with cancer from the second wave of the Swiss Cancer Patient Experiences study were analyzed. This cross‐sectional survey was conducted in eight Swiss hospitals from September 2021 to February 2022. Stepwise logistic regression examined the relationship between overall care rating and 29 patient experience items covering different patient‐centered care dimensions while adjusting for sociodemographic and health variables.ResultsOverall, patients rated their cancer care experience at 8.9 out of 10. Stepwise regression identified seven drivers contributing to overall care rating. The strongest drivers were “professionals worked well together” (odds ratio [OR], 4.81) and “tests were not repeated” (OR, 2.09) from the coordination and integration dimension, “offered support for symptoms during treatment” (OR, 2.11) from the physical comfort dimension, followed by “hospital staff ensured available home support” (OR, 1.99), “offered to see health professional for concerns” (OR, 1.91), “treatment options were explained” (OR, 1.75), and “involved in treatment decisions as desired” (OR, 1.68).ConclusionsThis study evaluated the care experiences of patients with cancer with a comprehensive tool that identified seven key factors independently associated with overall care rating. By concentrating on these areas, hospitals can not only improve the patient care experience but also efficiently allocate resources to quality improvement initiatives.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3