Factors associated with an inconclusive result from commercial homologous recombination deficiency testing in ovarian cancer

Author:

Sullivan Mackenzie W.1,Graves Stephen1,Adkoli Anusha2,Zhou Qin3,Iasonos Alexia3,Ellenson Lora H.4,Chi Dennis S.15,Aghajanian Carol67,Liu Ying L.67ORCID,Sonoda Yukio15,O’Cearbhaill Roisin E.67,Weigelt Britta4ORCID,Grisham Rachel N.67ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Gynecology Service Department of Surgery Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York New York USA

2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital New Brunswick New Jersey USA

3. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York New York USA

4. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York New York USA

5. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Weill Cornell Medical College New York New York USA

6. Gynecologic Medical Oncology Department of Medicine Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York New York USA

7. Department of Medicine Weill Cornell Medical College New York New York USA

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionHomologous recombination deficiency (HRD) testing is used to determine the appropriateness of poly ADP‐ribose polymerase inhibitors for patients with epithelial ovarian cancer and no germline/somatic BRCA1/2 alterations. Myriad MyChoice CDx reports a genomic instability score (GIS) to quantify the level of HRD, with a positive score defined as ≥42. The authors sought to define factors associated with obtaining an inconclusive HRD test result.MethodsGIS was retrieved for patients at their institution with epithelial ovarian cancer without germline/somatic BRCA1/2 deleterious alterations who underwent HRD testing from April 2020–August 2023. Clinical data were abstracted from the medical record.ResultsOf 477 HRD test results identified, 57 (12%) were inconclusive. High‐grade serous ovarian cancers had higher GIS than other histologic types (median 29 vs. 21, p < .001). Most HRD cases were of high‐grade serous histology; no cases with clear cell or endometrioid histology were HRD‐positive. On univariate analysis, interval versus primary cytoreductive surgery, other specimen sources versus surgical specimens, and chemotherapy exposure were risk factors for inconclusive HRD testing. On multivariable analysis, chemotherapy exposure, and tissue source were associated with an inconclusive test result, with surgical specimens more likely to yield a conclusive result than other sources (biopsy, cytology, other). Age, stage, self‐reported race, and histology were not associated with an inconclusive result.ConclusionsSurgical tissue was more likely to yield a conclusive HRD test result versus other sources of epithelial ovarian cancer tissue acquisition. When feasible, laparoscopic biopsy before initiation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy may increase the likelihood of obtaining interpretable HRD test results.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3