Mite non‐reproduction is not a consequence of the brood removal behavior of varroa sensitive hygiene honey bee colonies (Apis mellifera)

Abstract

AbstractA sustainable solution to the global threat of the Varroa destructor mite is the selection of varroa‐resistant honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies. Both “mite non‐reproduction” (MNR) and “varroa sensitive hygiene” (VSH) appear to be promising selection traits for achieving the goal of a resistant honey bee. MNR describes colonies that have a high number of non‐reproductive mites (no offspring, no males, or delayed development of mite offspring). High numbers of non‐reproductive mites have been observed in selected colonies, but the mechanism behind this trait has not yet been identified. The specialized hygienic behavior of selected honey bees, called VSH, is the removal of varroa‐infested brood. These traits were thought to be linked by VSH bees preferentially removing reproductive varroa females leaving only non‐reproductive mites behind in cells and thus creating colonies with high levels of MNR. To further investigate this link, we used an experimental setup and data sets from a four‐year selection project designed to breed for MNR and VSH colonies. In addition, we sought to answer the question of whether non‐reproductive mites are a direct consequence of worker removal behavior. To test this, we artificially induced removal behavior, and after providing the mite with enough time to re‐enter another cell, we opened all capped cells, relocated the mites, and evaluated their reproduction. As shown in previous studies and in this study, VSH had no effect on MNR levels. Also, the induced removal behavior did not lead to non‐reproduction in the subsequent reproductive cycle post interruption. We thus concluded that breeding for non‐reproductive mites does not automatically breed for VSH behavior and worker removal behavior does not cause subsequent reproductive failure of the mites forced to flee and find a new cell for reproduction.