Randomized clinical trial of sacral nerve stimulation for refractory constipation

Author:

Zerbib F1,Siproudhis L2,Lehur P-A3,Germain C4,Mion F5,Leroi A-M6,Coffin B7,Le Sidaner A8,Vitton V9,Bouyssou-Cellier C1,Chene G4,Zerbib F10,Simon M10,Denost Q10,Lepicard P10,Lehur P-A11,Meurette G11,Wyart V11,Kubis C11,Mion F12,Roman S12,Damon H12,Barth X12,Leroi A-M13,Bridoux V13,Gourcerol G13,Coffin B14,Castel B14,Gorbatchef C14,Le Sidaner Anne15,Mathonnet M15,Vitton V16,Lesavre N16,Orsoni P16,Siproudhis L17,Brochard C17,Desfourneaux V17

Affiliation:

1. Department of Gastroenterology, Bordeaux University Hospital, and Université de Bordeaux and Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) CIC 1401, Bordeaux, France

2. Department of Gastroenterology, Rennes University Hospital, and Université de Rennes, Rennes, France

3. Institut des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France

4. Clinical Epidemiology Unit, and Bordeaux University Hospital and INSERM CIC 1401-EC, Bordeaux, France

5. Department of Digestive Physiology, Lyon University Hospital, and Université Claude Bernard, Lyon, France

6. Department of Digestive and Urinary Physiology, Rouen University Hospital, and Université de Rouen, Rouen, France

7. Department of Gastroenterology, Louis Mourier University Hospital, Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Colombes, and Université Denis Diderot Paris 7, Paris, France

8. Department of Gastroenterology, Limoges University Hospital, Limoges, France

9. Department of Gastroenterology, Hôpital Nord, Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Marseille, and Plateforme d'Interface Clinique, CRN2M, Unité Mixte de Recherche 7286, and Aix Marseille Université, Marseille, France

10. Bordeaux

11. Nantes

12. Lyon

13. Rouen

14. Colombes

15. Limoges

16. Marseille

17. Rennes

Abstract

Abstract Background Open studies have reported favourable results for sacral nerve stimulation in the treatment of refractory constipation. Here, its efficacy was assessed in a double-blind crossover RCT. Methods Patients with at least two of the following criteria were included: fewer than three bowel movements per week; straining to evacuate on more than 25 per cent of attempts; or sensation of incomplete evacuation on more than 25 per cent of occasions. Response to therapy was defined as at least three bowel movements per week and/or more than 50 per cent improvement in symptoms. Responders to an initial 3-week peripheral nerve evaluation were offered permanent implantation of a pulse generator and were assigned randomly in a crossover design to two 8-week intervals of active or sham stimulation. At the end of the two trial periods, the patients received active stimulation until the final evaluation at 1 year. Results Thirty-six patients (34 women; mean(s.d.) age 45(14) years) underwent peripheral nerve evaluation. Twenty responded and received a permanent stimulator. A positive response was observed in 12 of 20 and 11 of 20 patients after active and sham stimulation periods respectively (P = 0·746). Pain related to the device occurred in five patients and wound infection or haematoma in three, leading to definitive removal of the pulse generator in two patients. At 1 year, 11 of the 20 patients with an implanted device continued to respond. Stimulation had no significant effect on colonic transit time. Conclusion These results do not support the recommendation of permanent implantation of a pulse generator in patients with refractory constipation who initially responded to temporary nerve stimulation. Registration number: NCT01629303 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Funder

French Ministry of Health

Menarini

Coloplast

Shire

Almirall

Direction Générale de l'Organisation Sanitaire

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Surgery

Reference23 articles.

1. Epidemiology of constipation in the United States;Sonnenberg;Dis Colon Rectum,1989

2. An epidemiological survey of constipation in Canada: definitions, rates, demographics, and predictors of health care seeking;Pare;Am J Gastroenterol,2001

3. Epidemiology of constipation (EPOC) study in the United States: relation of clinical subtypes to sociodemographic features;Stewart;Am J Gastroenterol,1999

4. Systematic review: impact of constipation on quality of life in adults and children;Belsey;Aliment Pharmacol Ther,2010

5. Defecation: colectomy for constipation – a time for renewed caution?;Knowles;Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol,2015

Cited by 68 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3