1. In reference to fig 4 a question may arise as to how to distinguish a confounder from a collider. This task can be completed via theback‐doorandfront‐door adjustments. The back‐door adjustment states that (1) no node inZis a descendent ofX and (2) any path betweenXandYthat begins with an arrow intoX(known as a back‐door path) is blocked byZ then controlling forZblocks the non‐causal paths. If the confounder isunobservable/theoretical then the front‐door adjustment can be applied. In this process we add a new variable that we may assume it is not caused directly by the confounder and then apply the back‐door adjustment to estimate the effect of the new variable.
2. Other assumptions also exist such as Gaussianity of the noise distribution one or several experimental settings and linearity/nonlinearity acyclicity—see (Heinze‐Deml et al. 2018).
3. For additional metrics for evaluating DAGs please see (Nogueira et al. 2022; Shi et al. 2022).
4. For a more detailed discussion on causality from the intersection of philosophy epistemology and ontology please refer to (Michotte 2017; Salmon 2003).
5. In the event where an event is time dependent then other approaches such as Granger causality or Sim causality can be applied examined. Please refer to (Granger 1969; Sims 1972).