The day after mowing: Time and type of mowing influence grassland arthropods

Author:

Berger Johanna L.1ORCID,Staab Michael1ORCID,Hartlieb Margarita1ORCID,Simons Nadja K.2ORCID,Wells Konstans3ORCID,Gossner Martin M.45ORCID,Vogt Juliane6,Achury Rafael7ORCID,Seibold Sebastian78ORCID,Hemp Andreas9ORCID,Weisser Wolfgang W.7ORCID,Blüthgen Nico1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Ecological Networks Technische Universität Darmstadt Darmstadt Germany

2. Applied Biodiversity Science Biocenter, University of Würzburg Würzburg Germany

3. Department of Biosciences Swansea University Swansea UK

4. Forest Entomology, Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow, and Landscape Research WSL Birmensdorf Switzerland

5. Institute of Terrestrial Ecosystems ITES, ETH Zürich Zürich Switzerland

6. Natura 2000‐Station Unstrut‐Hainich/Eichsfeld, Wildtierland Hainich gGmbH Hörselberg‐Hainich Germany

7. Terrestrial Ecology Research Group, Department of Ecology and Ecosystem Management Technical University of Munich Freising Germany

8. Forest Zoology Technische Universität Dresden Tharandt Germany

9. Department of Plant Systematics University of Bayreuth Bayreuth Germany

Abstract

AbstractRecent losses in the abundance and diversity of arthropods have been documented in many regions and ecosystems. In grasslands, such insect declines are largely attributed to land use, including modern machinery and mowing regimes. However, the effects of different mowing techniques on arthropods remain poorly understood. Using 11 years of data from 111 agricultural grassland plots across Germany, we analyzed the influence of various grassland management variables on the abundance and abundance‐accounted species richness of four arthropod orders: Araneae, Coleoptera, Hemiptera, and Orthoptera. The analysis focused on detailed mowing information, for example, days after mowing and mower type, and compared their effect with other aspects of grassland management, that is, rolling, leveling, fertilization, and grazing. We found strong negative effects of mowing on all four arthropod orders, with arthropod abundance being lowest directly after mowing and steadily increasing to three to seven times the abundance after 100 days post‐mowing. Likewise, Hemiptera and Coleoptera species richness was 30% higher 100 days after mowing. Mower width showed a positive effect on Orthoptera abundance, but not on the other arthropods. Arthropod abundance and Coleoptera species richness were lowest when a mulcher was used compared to rotary or bar mowers. In addition to mowing, intensive grazing negatively affected Orthoptera abundance but not the other orders. Mowing represents a highly disturbing and iterative stressor with negative effects on arthropod abundance and diversity, likely contributed by mowing‐induced mortality and habitat alteration. While modifications of mowing techniques such as mower type or mowing height and width may help to reduce the negative impact of mowing on arthropods, our results show that mowing itself has the most substantial negative effect. Based on our results, we suggest that reduced mowing frequency, omission of mowing in parts of the grassland (refuges), or extensive grazing instead of mowing have the greatest potential to promote arthropod populations.

Funder

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3