In‐hospital outcome differences between transradial and transfemoral coronary approaches: Data from the Korean percutaneous coronary intervention registry-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

In‐hospital outcome differences between transradial and transfemoral coronary approaches: Data from the Korean percutaneous coronary intervention registry

Published:2019-01-02 Issue:3 Volume:94 Page:378-384
ISSN:1522-1946
Container-title:Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
language:en
Short-container-title:Catheter Cardiovasc Interv

Author:

Ahn Sung Gyun¹^ORCID,Lee Jun‐Won¹,Youn Young Jin¹^ORCID,Lee Seung‐Hwan¹,Cho Jang Hyun²,Kang Woong Chol³^ORCID,Park Jong‐Pil⁴,Shin Won‐Yong⁵,Lim Seong‐Hoon⁶,Choi Yu Jeong⁷,Kim Kyungsoo⁸^ORCID,Lim Do‐Sun⁹^ORCID,Chun Woojung¹⁰,Kim Ju Han¹¹,Yoon Junghan¹

Affiliation:

1. Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal MedicineYonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital Wonju Republic of Korea

2. Department of CardiologySt. Carollo Hospital Republic of Korea

3. Department of Cardiology, Department of Internal MedicineGachon University Gil Medical Center Incheon Republic of Korea

4. Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal MedicinePresbyterian Medical Center Jeonju Republic of Korea

5. Department of CardiologySoon Chun Hyang University Cheonan Hospital Cheonan Republic of Korea

6. Division of Cardiovascular disease, College of MedicineDankook University Hospital Cheonan Republic of Korea

7. Eulji University School of Medicine, Division of CardiologyEulji Medical Center Daejeon Republic of Korea

8. Department of CardiologyHanyang University Hospital Seoul Republic of Korea

9. Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular CenterKorea University Anam Hospital Seoul Republic of Korea

10. Department of Cardiology, Samsung Changwon HospitalSungkyunkwan University School of Medicine Changwon Republic of Korea

11. Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular CenterChonnam National University Hospital Republic of Korea

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine

Link

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ccd.28032

Reference25 articles.

1. Transradial Approach as a Default Route in Coronary Artery Interventions

2. Current Practice of Transradial Coronary Angiography and Intervention: Results from the Korean Transradial Intervention Prospective Registry

3. The Current Status of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Korea: Based on Year 2014 Cohort of Korean Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (K-PCI) Registry

4. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention and the impact on major bleeding and ischemic events: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

5. Transradial versus transfemoral approach for diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention in people with coronary artery disease;Kolkailah AA;Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2018

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Access route selection for percutaneous coronary intervention among Vietnamese patients: Implications for in-hospital costs and outcomes;The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific;2021-04

2. Radial artery access among mainstays of contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention: Is it time to forget how to puncture a femoral artery?;Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions;2019-09